Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FP2
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FP2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 8000 was introduced 6 months before the FP2 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the 8000 scores against the FP2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Panasonic FP2
8000 | FP2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus 8000
FP2 | 8000 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FP2
8000 | FP2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | January 2010 | Similar age | |
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Panasonic FP2 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 8000 and Panasonic FP2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the 8000 against the FP2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and FP2 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The image underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and FP2.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic FP2 to offer extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively.
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 pounds) | 151g (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $380 | $80 |