Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-330
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Olympus VR-330, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-850 iHS was revealed 3 years later than the VR-330 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-850 iHS scores versus the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus VR-330
| TG-850 iHS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | February 2011 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| VR-330 | TG-850 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Olympus VR-330
| TG-850 iHS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-850 iHS vs the VR-330.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and VR-330 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-850 iHS and VR-330.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-850 iHS to deliver more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent TG-850 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $220 |
