Clicky

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
81
Overall
63

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs

Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Panasonic FZ2500
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
  • Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic Lumix FZ2500: A Detailed Comparison for Photographers

As a seasoned camera reviewer with over 15 years of hands-on testing experience, I’ve seen the market evolve at a dizzying pace. Today, I’m digging deep into a pair of distinct photographic tools: the rugged Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS (henceforth TG-850) and the versatile bridge camera Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (we’ll call it FZ2500). Despite their divergent designs and target users, both still deserve a careful look for photographers wanting compact convenience without a full interchangeable lens system. If you’re weighing these two for your next camera, let’s unpack their attributes across various photography genres, technical features, and real-world performance.

Putting Size and Design Under the Microscope

First impressions matter, and for cameras, that often begins with handling and ergonomics.

The TG-850 iHS is a compact, matte-black chameleon built tough to survive the outdoors: waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, crushproof, and freezeproof - a veritable survivalist’s companion. Its physical dimensions (110x64x28mm) and featherweight 218g make it pocket-friendly and ideal for adventurous travels or poolside shooting when you can’t risk a bulky rig.
Meanwhile, the FZ2500, by contrast, is a larger, heftier beast: an SLR-like bridge camera with a robust grip, measuring 138x102x135mm and tipping the scales at 915g. It’s not made for slinging in your pocket but rather for someone serious about zoom versatility and control comfort over long shoots.

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison

The TG-850’s control layout is minimalist by design, featuring mostly exposure presets and a tilting, non-touch TFT LCD screen. In comparison, the FZ2500’s top panel flaunts an array of dials, buttons, and an interface begging for tactile interaction and fast manual adjustments - more akin to a DSLR, but without the interchangeable lenses.

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison

In essence, if you crave ultra-portability with rugged reliability, TG-850 wins on form factor. If you prioritize ergonomic sophistication with accessible manual control for shooting precision, FZ2500 takes the trophy.

Sensor and Image Quality: Beyond Megapixels

At the heart of any camera lies its sensor. This is where the FZ2500 flexes serious muscle: a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor with 20 megapixels and a substantial 116.16 mm² capture area. The TG-850’s sensor is a common 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS chip of 16 megapixels and 28.07 mm² area, typical of compact point-and-shoots but far smaller than the one-inch sensor standard in premium compacts and bridge cameras.

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison

All else equal, that bigger sensor translates into fundamentally better image quality - especially in dynamic range and low-light scenarios. Digging into lab scores (DxOMark rates the FZ2500 at 70 overall with a color depth of 23 and dynamic range of 12.6 stops), it’s clear this camera delivers more breathing room in highlights and shadows, and cleaner high ISO results. By contrast, the TG-850 scores were not tested, but generally, cameras with its sensor size hit a performance plateau that’s tough to beat.

In practical terms, the FZ2500 produces punchier detail, smoother gradations, and stronger noise control, crucial when shooting in challenging conditions like dim indoor events or night landscapes. The TG-850 is serviceable for casual shooting in daylight but struggles to maintain detail fidelity and tonal nuance when the light dips.

The Viewfinder and Display: Composition Made Easier

The TG-850 omits a viewfinder altogether, relying solely on a 3-inch tilting TFT LCD LCD with 460k-dot resolution. This screen tilts, helping compose shots from creative low or high angles - handy, but the low resolution and reflective surface can hamper clear visibility in bright outdoor conditions.

The FZ2500 offers a far superior multimedia interface: a 3-inch fully articulating touchscreen LCD with a sharp 1040k-dot resolution and a 0.74x magnification 2360k-dot OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF). The EVF is a significant boon for compositions in sunlight or with fast-moving subjects, offering 100% frame coverage and sharp detail. Moreover, the touch sensitivity simplifies focus point selection and menu navigation.

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Bottom line: If you need a viewing experience that rivals DSLRs for outdoor and professional use, the FZ2500 nails it. For casual snapshots or rugged outdoor use, the TG-850’s display is adequate but not more.

Exploring Photography Genres Through Their Strengths

Portrait Photography

Portraits demand accurate skin tones, pleasing bokeh, and sharp eye detection. The FZ2500 utilizes its larger sensor and fast F2.8-4.5 aperture at the wide end to isolate subjects better with smoother background separation. Its advanced face detection autofocus effectively locks onto eyes, making indoor or studio portraits more reliable.

The TG-850, limited by its small sensor and slower max aperture (F3.5-5.7), produces portraits that are softer, less defined, and with less subject-background separation. Eye detection is present but less sophisticated.

Verdict: For portrait lovers craving creamy bokeh and depth, the FZ2500 leads with clear AF advantages.

Landscape Photography

Landscape photography thrives on dynamic range, resolution, weather sealing, and lens sharpness.

The TG-850’s rugged weatherproof body supports shooting in harsh climates - think beach, rain, or snow - making it a practical choice when you need durability over sheer image finesse. However, at 16MP and a small sensor, image quality and dynamic range lag behind. Plus, its lens focal range (21-105mm equivalent) is limited for wide expansive shots.

The FZ2500 offers a 20MP sensor with excellent dynamic range and a versatile 24-480mm zoom (20x). Though not weather sealed, its lens sharpness and sensor quality render highly detailed landscape images. The lack of weather proofing means you must be more cautious outdoors.

So for breathtaking, high-res landscapes under controlled conditions, FZ2500 is superior, but for rugged wilderness adventures where gear survivability is priority, TG-850 stands strong.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Both genres call for fast and reliable autofocus, generous telephoto reach, and rapid continuous shooting.

The FZ2500’s 12 fps burst speed combined with a 20x zoom lens (equiv. 480mm at telephoto) makes it suited for capturing wildlife and fast action sequences with precision. Its AF system uses 49 focus points and offers continuous, tracking, and face detection autofocus modes. The manual focus option and customizable buttons enhance fine control during tracking.

TG-850, with a 7 fps burst and smaller 5x zoom reaching 105mm equivalent, struggles to capture distant or rapid subjects, limiting its usefulness for wildlife or sport photography. The touchscreenless UI and fixed lens hinder specialized focus workflows.

In short, the FZ2500 can substitute entry-level DSLRs for wildlife and sports amateurs, while TG-850 remains a casual shooter’s compact.

Street Photography

Street photographers often prize discretion, portability, and quick-reacting autofocus.

The TG-850’s compact size lets it easily vanish in crowds and bag pockets, encouraging candid shooting. Its lens covers standard focal lengths sufficient for exploratory urban walks, and the tilting screen aids creative shooting angles.

FZ2500, with its imposing bridge camera profile, risks drawing attention and bulkiness complicating quick shooting. However, its fast autofocus and EVF encourage thoughtful compositions.

For street photography, the TG-850 offers stealth and simplicity. FZ2500’s advantage lies in image quality and flexibility but at the cost of size.

Macro Photography

Close-up work demands precise focusing and sometimes dedicated macro modes.

The FZ2500 impresses with a 3cm minimum focus distance and focus bracketing/stacking capabilities offering depth expansions seldom found in bridge cameras. Stabilization further aids handheld macro captures.

The TG-850 lacks explicit macro focus range specs and advanced focusing aids, but its optical IS does assist in steadying shots.

Overall, for macro enthusiasts, the FZ2500 delivers superior features and control.

Night and Astro Photography

Long exposures and high ISO sensitivity challenge camera electronics.

The FZ2500 excels with a max native ISO of 12,800 and boost to 25,600, paired with a wide f/2.8 aperture and 16,000th sec silent electronic shutter. It supports RAW capture for post-processing flexibility - critical for astrophotography or low-light creative work.

The TG-850 max ISO of 6400 and fixed aperture restrict noise management in dark scenes. Its lack of RAW output limits post-shoot corrections.

The clear winner for night domains is the FZ2500.

Video Capabilities

Videographers should compare video resolution, stabilization, and audio inputs.

TG-850 shoots Full HD at 60fps capturing smooth footage in daylight, adding optical image stabilization but lacks microphone/headphone jacks and only outputs via HDMI and USB 2.0.

The FZ2500 supports 4K DCI (4096x2160) at 24p with 100 Mbps bitrate, full HD slow motion, and offers optical stabilization and a microphone/headphone jack catering to serious video production.

The FZ2500 is a camera ready for hybrid photo-video creators; TG-850 is limited to casual video users.

Travel and Everyday Use

Both cameras serve travelers but cater to very different styles.

TG-850’s sturdy, waterproof design, compactness, and lightweight make it an expedition-ready companion, capable of withstanding abuse. Battery life is decent at 330 shots, and wireless connectivity enables quick social sharing.

The much larger FZ2500 has longer battery life (350 shots), extensive focal range lens, and advanced controls for those who want a near-DSLR experience without system bulk. However, its size, weight, and lack of weather-sealing require more careful handling.

Professional Applications

For professional work, reliability, image quality, and workflow compatibility matter.

The FZ2500 offers RAW image capture, extensive exposure modes (including shutter, aperture priority, full manual), focus bracketing, and an advanced autofocus system, fitting handily into professional workflows.

The TG-850, lacking RAW, manual exposure, or extensive AF controls, positions more as a rugged casual shooter or backup camera for professionals.

Autofocus and Image Stabilization: Speed Versus Resilience

Both cameras incorporate optical image stabilization to combat shake, an essential feature for handheld shooting.

The TG-850’s stabilization does a fine job at its sensor size and lens parameters but is inherently limited in action or telephoto uses compared to the FZ2500’s newer, more sophisticated system optimized for its long zoom lens.

The FZ2500’s autofocus employs 49 contrast-detection points with face detection, live view AF, and touch AF, supporting continuous tracking at 12fps bursts - a recipe for well-locked subject tracking in fast scenarios.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing

Here, the TG-850 stands alone as the rugged champion, boasting certifications for underwater use to 15m, shockproof (2m drop), crushproof (100kgf), freezeproof (-10°C), and dustproof. This makes it ideal for adventure photographers who don’t want to toy with bulky housings.

The FZ2500, while solidly built with a magnesium alloy chassis in parts, lacks formal weatherproofing and is vulnerable to harsh environmental elements.

Lens Ecosystem and Zoom Versatility

Neither camera accepts interchangeable lenses - they both sport fixed zoom lenses.

However, the FZ2500’s 24-480mm zoom (20x) with a constant aperture of f/2.8-4.5 stands out for versatility, covering everything from wide angle landscapes to wildlife telephoto ranges with respectable aperture speed.

The TG-850’s 21-105mm (5x zoom, f/3.5-5.7) works well for general photography but is limited for distant subjects or creative wide perspectives.

Connectivity and Storage

Both cameras use SD-type memory cards with a single slot, simplifying storage options.

Wireless connectivity is built-in for each, with the TG-850 offering WiFi (but no Bluetooth or NFC), and the FZ2500 also using WiFi without Bluetooth or NFC. Neither camera offers GPS tagging, which could have been a plus for travel.

For data transfer and tethered shooting, both provide USB 2.0 and HDMI connections.

Battery Life and Real-World Use

Battery life is broadly similar: 330 shots for TG-850 and 350 for FZ2500 using their respective lithium-ion packs. Given the much larger sensor and richer features of FZ2500, this is a credit to Panasonic’s engineering.

Still, expect the FZ2500 to consume more power in video, EVF use, and zooming.

Pricing and Value

At launch, the TG-850 hovered around $250, making it an affordable, rugged compact for casual shooters or travelers.

The FZ2500 launched near $1000, a premium price justified by its large sensor, lens speed, 4K video, manual controls, and professional-grade features.

One is an entry-level adventure companion; the other is a serious hybrid superzoom tool with considerable creative latitude.

Summary Performance Ratings

Clear performance gaps are visible: The FZ2500 outperforms in image quality, autofocus sophistication, video, and versatility - but trades off portability and ruggedness.

Specialty Genre Ratings

  • Portrait, landscape, macro, and video scoring strongly favor the FZ2500.
  • Durability, portability, and outdoor use favor the TG-850.
  • Wildlife and sports tilt heavily toward FZ2500 due to zoom and AF.

Real-World Sample Images

Side-by-side sample images reveal the contrast in noise handling, dynamic range, and resolution capabilities we discussed. The FZ2500 keeps noise in check in shadows and highlights crisp details at telephoto lengths; the TG-850’s images appear softer with less tonal depth.

Final Recommendations: Choosing Based on Your Photography Style

Pick the Olympus TG-850 iHS If:

  • You want a no-nonsense, tough camera for hiking, swimming, skiing, or rough environments.
  • Portability and durability trumps image quality.
  • Your photography is casual snapshots and travel documentation under varying weather conditions.
  • Budget constraints require something sub-$300 that withstands abuse.

Pick the Panasonic Lumix FZ2500 If:

  • You seek a multimedia workhorse that covers photos and 4K video with a large sensor.
  • Aperture control, manual modes, and RAW output matter to you.
  • You want a long zoom lens with sharp image quality suitable for wildlife, landscapes, portraits, and sports.
  • You are comfortable with a larger, heavier camera that rewards you with creative flexibility.
  • Your budget supports a near-$1000 investment in a versatile superzoom bridge camera.

Closing Thoughts

These two cameras serve sharply different niches. The TG-850 is a rugged, ultra-portable point-and-shoot that functions admirably for adventurers and the occasional day trip photographer needing a splash-proof device. On the flip side, the FZ2500 represents the matured large sensor superzoom genre with advanced interfaces and superior image quality - an ideal choice for enthusiasts looking for DSLR-like control in a fixed lens form factor.

Ultimately, which camera you choose depends less on specs and more on your personal photographic journey. After testing thousands of cameras, I can say confidently that pairing your gear with your shooting style and environment always yields the most satisfaction.

Happy shooting!

All images are © the respective manufacturers and used here for illustrative review purposes.

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500
 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHSPanasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500
Also Known as - Lumix DMC-FZ2000
Class Waterproof Large Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-01-29 2016-09-19
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII Venus Engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4616 x 3464 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 6400 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 125 125
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 49
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 21-105mm (5.0x) 24-480mm (20.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.7 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus range - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 7.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 13.20 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings - Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 4096x2160
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Yes Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 218 grams (0.48 lbs) 915 grams (2.02 lbs)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 350 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B DMW-BLC12
Self timer Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $250 $998