Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX1
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Ricoh CX1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-850 iHS was unveiled 5 years later than the CX1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-850 iHS scores versus the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Ricoh CX1
TG-850 iHS | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
CX1 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh CX1
TG-850 iHS | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-850 iHS against the CX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and CX1 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and CX1.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-850 iHS to provide greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher TG-850 iHS will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh CX1 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-01-29 | 2009-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lbs) | 180g (0.40 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $250 | $299 |