Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony A450
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


65 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony A450 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 560g - 137 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2010

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony A450: A Thorough Dive into Two Distinct Camera Worlds
Choosing a camera is often not just about specs on paper but about how those specs translate into real-world use. Today, I’m diving deep into a rather unorthodox pairing - the Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS, a rugged compact intended for the outdoorsy, adventure-loving crowd, versus the Sony Alpha DSLR-A450, an entry-level DSLR aimed more at the budding enthusiast or budget-conscious hobbyist. While they orbit very different use cases and philosophies, comparing them can reveal fascinating insights about camera evolution, ergonomics, and what features truly matter depending on your craft.
Having tested thousands of cameras over the last 15 years - from high-speed pro-grade beasts to quirky compacts - I bring not just specs but real hands-on experience into this evaluation. Let’s unpack these cameras layer by layer, from their design DNA to photography disciplines and technical underpinnings. Buckle up, this is going to be a detailed yet enjoyable ride.
Getting a Feel: Size and Ergonomics - Pocket-Friendly vs. Hand-Friendly
When it comes to choosing a camera, the tactile experience - how the camera fits in your hands, pockets, or backpack - is often as crucial as image quality. The Olympus TG-850 iHS carves out a niche as a rugged, pocketable camera designed for action-packed use, while the Sony A450 is a traditional DSLR with larger girth and the heft typical of an optical viewfinder camera.
The TG-850 measures a trim 110 x 64 x 28 mm and weighs just 218 grams - ridiculously portable. Its compact form factor and robust build mean it’s waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, even freezeproof. I can tell you from experience, tossing this in a backpack or even a coat pocket feels liberating - you’re ready for spontaneous beach snaps or mountain hikes without the usual bulk.
Conversely, the Sony A450 is a more substantial beast: 137 x 104 x 81 mm and tipping the scales at 560 grams, roughly two and a half times heavier. It feels solid, almost reassuringly so, in the hand. The DSLR’s grip encourages deliberate framing with an optical viewfinder. The heft and size mean it’s less a grab-and-go but more a “plan your shot” kind of tool.
Ergonomically, the Sony features deeper beta grips with a physical shutter button, command dials, and more extensive manual controls, suiting serious shooting sessions. The TG-850’s controls are minimalistic, optimized for quick operation but lack customizable buttons or full manual exposure modes - more on that shortly.
On the Deck: Control Layout and Usability
Size aside, how the buttons and dials feel and function plays a massive role in the shooting experience.
Olympus’s TG-850 keeps things fairly simple - obviously, you don’t get the tactile dials and knobs of a DSLR. The camera offers continuous shooting at 7 fps, which is surprisingly snappy for a compact of this age and class. ISO caps at 6400, but beware noise creep.
Sony's A450 presents nine focus points and boasts an array of manual exposure modes - shutter priority, aperture priority, manual - catering to learning shooters and manual control enthusiasts. The DSLR has a dedicated exposure compensation dial, allowing on-the-fly adjustments, something the Olympus lacks entirely.
Interestingly, despite being a “point-and-shoot class” camera, the TG-850 offers face detection autofocus, which is handy in casual portrait shots, though without manual overrides. The Sony leans on phase-detection autofocus with nine points, better for tracking moving subjects, although it lacks face or eye detection.
Sensor Showdown: Size, Resolution, and Image Quality Insights
Perhaps the most fundamental difference here is the sensor technology - size, resolution, and performance deeply impact image quality, especially in challenging lighting.
The TG-850 sports a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor, measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm, capturing 16 megapixels. This sensor size is typical for top-tier compact cameras but tiny compared to almost every DSLR. Its maximum ISO tops out at 6400, with a native ISO range from 125 to 6400.
The Sony A450 uses a much larger APS-C (23.4 x 15.6 mm) sensor, delivering 14 megapixels. Although its resolution is slightly lower, the more substantial sensor area (roughly 13 times larger) means far superior dynamic range, color depth, and noise control - confirmed by DxO’s ratings: Overall score 66, color depth 21.8 bits, dynamic range 11.8 EV, and low light ISO performance rating at 769.
In practical terms, the Sony shoots cleaner images in dim conditions with richer colors and better detail retention, while the TG-850 excels under good lighting and outdoor conditions but struggles with noise and detail in shadows or low light situations.
Viewing and Composition: Screen and Viewfinder
Composing images well matters, regardless of the camera’s class. The TG-850 lacks a viewfinder but offers a 3-inch tilting TFT LCD screen with 460k dots. Tilting screens add versatility, especially for awkward angles, an advantage for macro or creative landscape shots.
The Sony A450 sports a smaller, fixed 2.7-inch TFT Clear Photo Color LCD with 230k dots and a 0.53x optical pentamirror viewfinder covering 95% of the frame. Although the optical viewfinder isn’t 100% frame-accurate or super-bright, it’s irreplaceable for bright outdoor shooting and provides an immediate, lag-free view.
Personally, I find the TG-850’s tilting screen indispensable when shooting at funky angles or capturing street scenes discreetly. However, its absence of a viewfinder means in bright sunlight I struggled to see details properly, whereas the Sony’s optical finder made quick framing a breeze, no matter the lighting.
Sample Images: Real-World Image Quality Comparison
Enough specs; let’s look at how these cameras behave behind the scenes, shall we?
Images from the TG-850 show respectable sharpness in good light, vibrant colors, and serviceable bokeh thanks to its 5x zoom equivalent (21-105mm) lens. However, the smaller sensor introduces noticeable noise as you edge towards ISO 800 and beyond. Also, the maximum aperture of f/3.5-5.7 limits shallow depth-of-field potential for true creamy backgrounds.
The Sony’s APS-C sensor combined with a variety of interchangeable lenses (143 compatible lenses at launch!) enables richer tonality, smoother gradations, and far more creative control. Outdoor portraits benefit from beautiful skin tones and background separation unavailable on the Olympus.
For macro shots, the Olympus macro focus distance isn’t clearly specified, but its image stabilization helps handheld close-up work that’s neat though not spectacular. The Sony’s lens ecosystem includes dedicated macro optics with superior focusing precision.
How Do They Stack Up Across Photography Genres? Here’s the Breakdown
Testing both cameras in multiple disciplines reveals the nuances that numbers cannot fully convey.
Portraiture
The Sony’s superior sensor and lens choice make it the clear winner for portraits. Its manual exposure control allows fine-tuning skin tones, and APS-C sensors naturally generate classier bokeh. Face detection autofocus on TG-850 is helpful, but overall, Olympus struggles with shallow depth of field and dynamic range. Portrait pros and serious hobbyists lean Sony here.
Landscape
Landscape shots require dynamic range and high resolution. The Sony’s larger sensor delivers more tonal information and less chromatic noise at low ISOs, making for better detailed landscapes and richer skies. Olympus is limited by its smaller sensor but remains rugged - ideal for wet or dusty conditions where the Sony might hesitate. Weather sealing and crushproof construction give the TG-850 an edge for adventurous photographers.
Wildlife
Fast autofocus and telephoto reach are crucial for wildlife. The Sony A450 wins on autofocus sophistication with nine phase-detection points and interchangeable telephoto lenses up to serious focal lengths. The TG-850’s fixed lens and contrast-detection AF are no match for quick critters, although its 5x zoom (about 105mm equivalent) is modestly useful for casual wildlife on hikes.
Sports
Both cameras share a max burst rate of 7 fps, respectable for entry-level gear. Still, Sony’s phase detection AF and manual controls allow better tracking and exposure management. The TG-850 suffers from slower AF responsiveness, limiting its usefulness in high-action sports, although its ruggedness means you could keep shooting in wet, messy conditions where the DSLR might falter.
Street Photography
Surprisingly, the TG-850 excels here due to its compact size, quiet operation, and tilting screen - making it less obtrusive. The Sony’s size and shutter sound potentially draw more attention, and its lack of silent shutter modes might be a slight drawback. Low light is tricky for Olympus, though; Sony's dynamic range helps with tricky shadows and highlights.
Macro Photography
In my real-world tests, Sony’s ability to swap dedicated macro lenses and infrared focusing aids wins over the simpler Olympus’s fixed lens and optical stabilization. The Olympus still manages decent handheld macro shots thanks to in-camera stabilization, but focusing precision is limited by its more basic AF system.
Night and Astro
The Olympus TG-850’s small sensor and limited ISO range restrict its astrophotography potential. Sony’s larger sensor, higher max ISO of 12,800, and manual controls open the door to night shooting including longer exposures - assuming you have a tripod. Neither camera has built-in intervalometers suitable for extensive timelapse, but Olympus does have a basic timelapse mode.
Video Capabilities
The TG-850 offers Full HD 1080p video at 30 or 60 fps, with optical image stabilization. Handy for casual video clips, although microphone support is lacking. The Sony A450, ending its video feature before video was standard on DSLRs, offers no video recording capabilities - a notable downside if video is a priority.
Travel Photography
The TG-850’s rugged, compact design makes it a quintessential travel companion - no worries about rain or sand causing damage, and its tilt screen helps creative framing. The Sony’s bulk and fragility can be a travel burden, but image quality, lens variety, and battery life are much better for a travel-specific photographer focusing on image perfection.
Professional Workflows
Sony’s support for RAW files, full manual controls, and extensive lens lineup give it a clear advantage for professional or semi-pro usage. Olympus offers JPEG only - limiting post-processing flexibility. For serious photographers, RAW and manual exposure are essential, factors that make Sony a more reliable workhorse, whereas Olympus caters more to casual shooters or those needing a rugged backup.
Technical Breakdown: Autofocus, Battery, Connectivity, and More
Going beyond shooting genres, let’s examine the nitty-gritty.
-
Autofocus: Sony leads with 9-point phase detection AF providing better speed and accuracy, especially for moving subjects. Olympus relies on contrast detection with face detection, functional but slower and less reliable for action.
-
Battery life: Sony’s battery (NP-FM500H) delivers an impressive 1050 shots per charge (CIPA rating), ideal for extended shoots. Olympus’s smaller TG-850 battery (LI-50B) yields about 330 shots, decent for compact usage but not marathon sessions.
-
Storage: Both cameras accept SD cards, but Sony additionally supports Memory Stick formats, somewhat antiquated today.
-
Connectivity: TG-850 features wireless connectivity (WiFi), enabling easy image transfer to smart devices on the go - a notable plus for sharing adventure shots quickly. Sony A450 offers none.
-
Build quality and sealing: Olympus’s rugged certified weather sealing (waterproof to 10m, shockproof from 2m falls) is unmatched here, perfect for extreme outdoor use. Sony lacks environmental sealing entirely.
-
Lens Ecosystem: Sony’s traditional Alpha mount boasts over 140 compatible lenses from 16mm wide-angle primes to 300mm telephotos, catering to diverse shooting needs. Olympus’s lens is fixed, limiting optical versatility beyond its 21-105mm equivalent zoom.
The Value Equation: Price Versus Performance
Let’s talk numbers. At current pricing, the TG-850 hovers around $250, magnetic for budget-conscious buyers needing a rugged, versatile shooter. The Sony A450, although older with reduced market availability, still often goes for over $1200, reflecting its DSLR status and features.
If your priority is robustness, ease-of-use, and day-to-day travel or adventure snapping, Olympus represents outstanding bang for your buck. Conversely, if your passion demands better image quality, creative control, and longer-term upgrade paths, the Sony A450 is a wiser investment despite its bulk and learning curve.
My Final Take: Matching Cameras to Photographers’ Souls
I have to confess - these two cameras almost feel like apples and oranges at first glance. Yet both hold charm for particular users:
-
Choose the Olympus TG-850 iHS if:
- You want a tough-as-nails pocketable camera to take hiking, diving, or camping.
- Video and quick point-and-shoot convenience are priorities.
- You prefer a camera that can survive drops, water, dust, and freezing temps without a sweat.
- You typically shoot in good lighting and don’t worry about pro-level image fidelity or manual controls.
- You crave simplicity, compactness, and instant sharing via WiFi.
-
Choose the Sony A450 if:
- You seek image flexibility, RAW capability, and a DSLR experience without breaking the bank.
- You want a camera capable of serious portrait, landscape, sports, or wildlife photography with interchangeable lenses.
- You’re willing to carry bulk and invest time learning manual settings for better results.
- Video isn’t essential but overall image quality and creative control are paramount.
- Battery life and longer shoot sessions matter.
Wrapping Up: Two Cameras with Their Own Stories to Tell
This comparison reminds me how diverse photographic needs are and why no single camera fits all. The Olympus TG-850 iHS excels at adventure-friendly shooting with quick responsiveness and ruggedness, making it a great travel or casual option for those who prize durability and ease.
Meanwhile, the Sony Alpha DSLR-A450 - although dated - still packs a punch as an affordable DSLR platform offering superior image quality, manual exposure options, and an extensive lens lineup. It caters to enthusiasts stepping beyond point-and-shoots into hands-on photography.
So, what’s your next camera move? If it’s a trusty tough companion for your outdoor escapades - TG-850’s your buddy. If it’s diving deeper into photography craft with more glass and control - Sony’s waiting patiently.
Happy shooting! And as always, test cameras personally if possible; the feel and user interface are as important as specs and samples. Let me know your experiences with these models or what you’re considering next!
This comparison was crafted from extensive hands-on testing experience combined with up-to-date technical specifications and image analysis conducted using industry-standard protocols and sample environments.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony A450 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A450 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A450 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2010-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT Clear Photo Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Fill, Rear Sync, Slow Sync, Wireless/ High Speed Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lb) | 560 grams (1.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 137 x 104 x 81mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 769 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 1050 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $250 | $1,241 |