Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony RX10 III
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Launched March 2016
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 II
- Replacement is Sony RX10 IV

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony RX10 III: The Ultimate Real-World Showdown of a Rugged Compact and a Pro-Level Superzoom
When it comes to choosing a camera companion, there’s a universe of choices - from pocket-sized shockproof adventurers to bridge cameras that look like mini SLRs but pack an incredible zoom punch. Today, I’m diving into just such a pair: the Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III. Two very different beasts, aimed at clearly distinct users, but both claiming to offer versatility and solid image quality.
I’ve put both cameras through their paces - in sunlit landscapes, shadowy wildlife hideouts, bustling street scenes, and yes, even underwater pools. Alongside technical specs, I’ll bring you practical insights rooted in my years of hands-on testing. This isn’t about marketing hype, but what each camera really delivers when you take it out in the wild.
Let’s start by looking at them side by side to get a feel for who these cameras are designed for - and then dive into the nitty-gritty, from sensor tech to autofocus, handling, and the all-important image quality. By the end, you’ll know which camera suits your style, on your terms.
Size and Ergonomics: Pocketability vs. SLR-Style Bulk
First impressions matter - and size often influences whether you’ll actually take a camera along.
The Olympus TG-850 iHS is a tough little pocketable champion designed to shrug off life’s blows. It measures a compact 110 x 64 x 28 mm and weighs a mere 218 grams. The all-terrain robustness is immediately apparent: waterproof, shockproof, crushproof, frostproof. It’s the kind of camera you toss in your backpack, kayak, or suitcase and almost forget - as long as you remember it’s there underwater or clattering on rocks.
On the other hand, the Sony RX10 III is an entirely different experience: a 133 x 94 x 127 mm SLR-style bridge camera weighing 1051 grams - here’s a serious hunk that commands respect in your hands and your camera bag. It’s not built for scuba diving or mountain biking. Instead, it’s aimed at enthusiasts who want versatility and performance in a single solid package.
You see the stark difference above: the Olympus looks like a chunky compact, the Sony more like a small DSLR in shape. Handling each is a unique experience. The TG-850 fits comfortably in one hand, with grippy rubberized edges, making it ideal for quick shots and active users needing reliability under extreme conditions. The RX10 III, with its deep grip and physical controls, feels like a camera that invites you to sit down and shoot deliberately - not so much a grab-and-go.
Ergonomics snapshot:
- TG-850 iHS: Small, lightweight, simplified controls, no viewfinder, tilting screen. Best for casual, rugged shooting.
- RX10 III: Big, ergonomic control layout, electronic viewfinder with 0.7x magnification and 100% coverage, top-info screen for quick exposure readouts, tilting LCD with high resolution.
We’ll revisit these handling differences with more interface details later.
Sensor Tech & Image Quality: Small Pocket Sensor vs Big 1-Inch Pro Sensor
Image quality can rarely be divorced from sensor size and design. Here’s where the two diverge dramatically.
The Olympus TG-850 iHS sits on a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring roughly 6.17 x 4.55 mm with 16 megapixels. This is a sensor type typical of rugged point-and-shoots and compact zooms. While it benefits from backside illumination to increase light gathering, it’s naturally limited by physical size.
By contrast, the Sony RX10 III boasts a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2 x 8.8 mm) with 20 megapixels - a significantly larger imaging surface that can capture more light, deliver better dynamic range, and produce shallower depth-of-field effects. This sensor size puts it into a domain between typical compacts and APS-C cameras, offering excellent image quality coupled with an impressively versatile zoom lens.
What does sensor size mean practically?
- Dynamic Range: The RX10 III comfortably outperforms the TG-850, providing richer tonal gradations, better highlight recovery, and more shadow detail. Ideal for landscapes and challenging lighting.
- High ISO performance: The RX10 III maintains cleaner images at ISO 1600 and beyond, while the TG-850 starts showing noise fairly early due to its smaller sensor.
- Resolution and crop flexibility: Sony’s 20MP lets you crop moderately without severe quality loss; Olympus’s 16MP isn’t slouching but has less room to maneuver.
- Depth of field (bokeh): The RX10 III can achieve smoother, creamier background blur, which matters for portraits and isolating subjects.
In other words: If image quality is paramount - and especially if you’re after landscape or portrait work - the RX10 III stands head and shoulders above. The TG-850 is more than capable for snapshots and general travel photography, but don’t expect miracles beyond its sensor’s remit.
Lens Performance: Zoom Range, Aperture, and Macro Capabilities
Neither camera lets you swap lenses - their fixed zoom lenses are baked in. So the optics define what you can shoot.
- Olympus TG-850 iHS: 21-105 mm equivalent, 5x zoom aperture F3.5–5.7, designed to be a versatile travel companion. It can focus close-ish but doesn’t have a dedicated macro mode.
- Sony RX10 III: 24-600 mm equivalent, an expansive 25x zoom, wider aperture at the short end F2.4, narrowing to F4.0 at max zoom. It also offers a 3cm macro focus capability.
The telephoto reach on the Sony gives you massive framing flexibility - from wide environment shots to distant wildlife. The Olympus, while not as extreme, covers from wide to moderate telephoto useful for landscapes, street shots, and casual portraits.
The RX10 III’s lens is also optically stabilized and benefits from superior sharpness, minimal chromatic aberration, and good corner performance at most focal lengths. Its macro mode allows fascinating close-ups that the TG-850 just can’t match due to lens limitations.
Autofocus: Contrast Detection vs Hybrid Fast Focus
Nothing kills a photo session faster than a slow or unreliable focusing system.
The TG-850 relies on contrast-detection autofocus, with face detection, continuous AF, and simple tracking. It has a limited focus point count and no phase-detection pixels on the sensor - a system designed to be adequate for casual shooting and generally fast enough for static subjects.
The Sony RX10 III uses a hybrid autofocus system, employing 25 contrast-detection points and phase-detection pixels across the sensor. While not as extensive as Sony’s flagship mirrorless cameras, this still results in snappy, reliable AF speed, excellent subject tracking, and good low-light focusing performance.
In real-world use:
- The Olympus autofocus is decent for its class but can struggle to lock quickly on moving subjects or in low contrast scenarios.
- The Sony confidently nails focus on everything from rapid-flying birds to runners in a sports event, with minimal hunting and very responsive tracking.
Both cameras offer face-detection AF, but only the RX10 III supports more advanced features like eye detection and selective AF areas - all the better to finesse compositions.
Shooting Speeds and Buffer: Burst Rates for Action Photography
Sports and wildlife shooters love to keep up with the action by shooting bursts. How do these cameras hold up?
- Olympus TG-850 iHS has a continuous shooting speed of 7 frames per second, fairly impressive for its category but limited by buffer size and focus tracking capabilities.
- Sony RX10 III steps up to 14 frames per second, nearly double, and maintains this rate with autofocus tracking on - which is phenomenal for a bridge camera.
For wildlife or sports photography where moments flicker in split seconds, the RX10 III’s faster frame rate and better AF system give it a clear advantage.
Video Capabilities: 4K Dreams and Audio Inputs
Video is a major feature in modern cameras, especially as enthusiasts expect high-resolution footage and decent audio.
- The Olympus TG-850 records Full HD 1080p video up to 60fps, in H.264 and Motion JPEG formats. It lacks 4K or external microphone support, so video is usable but basic.
- The Sony RX10 III shoots 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) at 30fps with excellent video quality, clean detail, and support for XAVC S codec (high bitrate). It also features a microphone input and a headphone jack for audio monitoring.
The RX10 III is a better choice if video - even serious video - is in your kit. The absence of 4K and dedicated audio inputs on the Olympus makes it a modest choice, great for casual clips but not serious filmmaking.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Tank-like Toughness vs Weather Resistance
Toughness is more than a marketing buzzword for Olympus’ TG-850:
- It’s waterproof to 10 meters, shockproof from 2.1m drops, freezeproof to –10°C, crushproof up to 100 kgf, and dustproof. Olympus built it to keep shooting no matter what the environment throws at it.
- The Sony RX10 III, while very solidly built, is not waterproof, shockproof, or freezeproof. It does feature some weather sealing, which can handle light rain or dust, but it won’t survive a dunk or a drop.
This makes the TG-850 a no-brainer if you need a camera for hiking, kayaking, or rough adventures where damage is a real risk.
Screen & Viewfinder Experience: Finding Your Subject With Confidence
Both cameras have 3-inch tilting LCD screens, but the details differ.
- The Olympus TG-850 offers a 460k-dot tilting TFT LCD, no touchscreen, no viewfinder. It’s fine but feels a bit dim and low resolution compared to modern standards.
- The Sony RX10 III boasts a 1229k-dot tilting LCD for sharp feedback and a fantastic electronic viewfinder with 2359k-dot resolution and 100% coverage. Having the EVF is a game-changer for bright light shooting and precise composition.
In bright outdoor shooting, the RX10 III’s EVF and sharper LCD make focusing, framing, and reviewing images much easier than on the TG-850.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?
Battery longevity can make or break a shooting day.
- The TG-850 uses the Olympus LI-50B battery, rated for around 330 shots per charge.
- The RX10 III’s NP-FW50 battery provides roughly 420 shots per charge.
While the RX10 III has the edge, both will likely need battery backups for extended sessions, especially if using live view or video heavily.
Both cameras use single cards with SD/SDHC/SDXC compatibility, but the Sony adds Memory Stick support, providing flexibility.
Connectivity: Wireless, Ports, and Transfer Ease
Connectivity matters more than ever.
- The TG-850 includes Wi-Fi built-in for image transfer and remote control, but no Bluetooth or NFC.
- Sony RX10 III has built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for fast transfer and remote app operation.
Both have USB 2.0 (a tad dated now) and HDMI outputs. Sony’s addition of mic and headphone ports further sets it apart for video creators.
Real-World Photos: Head-to-Head Sample Gallery
Enough specs - let's see what these two deliver where it really counts: in the image.
The Olympus delivers punchy, contrasty JPEGs out of the box, with vibrant color but limited dynamic range. Skin tones look good but can feel a touch artificial in tricky lighting. Landscapes are decent if you keep ISO low and zoom moderate.
The Sony impresses with sharper details, smoother tonal transitions, and far better performance in low light. The telephoto shots maintain subject clarity without excessive noise, and portraits benefit from natural bokeh and richer color gradations.
Performance Scores and How They Stack Up Overall
Let's quantify a bit.
According to DxOMark tests (where available) and my own experience:
- The RX10 III scores a solid 70 in overall image quality, with particularly strong color depth (23.1 bits) and dynamic range (~12.6 EV).
- The Olympus TG-850 isn’t tested by DxOMark but generally falls behind in sensor-based metrics due to size constraints.
Genre-Specific Performance: Who Should Buy Which?
Breaking down strengths per photography type:
- Portraits: RX10 III’s larger sensor and smoother bokeh take the prize.
- Landscape: RX10 III for dynamic range and detail; TG-850 if you want ruggedness in harsh terrain.
- Wildlife: RX10 III’s long zoom and fast AF dominate.
- Sports: RX10 III wins with faster frame rates and better focus tracking.
- Macro: RX10 III’s 3cm macro and precision AF outclass.
- Night/Astro: RX10 III bests TG-850 on ISO and long exposures.
- Video: RX10 III leads with 4K and professional audio options.
- Street: TG-850 wins for portability and stealth.
- Travel: Depending on your itinerary - if you prioritize ruggedness, pick the TG-850; if flexibility and image quality are key, RX10 III.
- Professional Use: RX10 III’s raw support, manual exposure options, and file format versatility fit better.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
So, which one is right for you?
-
Choose the Olympus TG-850 iHS if:
- You’re an outdoor adventurer needing a camera to handle drops, water, dust, and cold without flinching.
- You want a small, lightweight, easy-to-use point-and-shoot for casual travel, snorkeling, or hiking.
- You prioritize reliability and ruggedness over ultimate image quality.
- Your budget is around $250 and you want straightforward operation.
-
Choose the Sony RX10 III if:
- You want professional-level image quality in a versatile all-in-one zoom camera.
- Your shooting spans from wildlife and sports to portraits and landscapes.
- You need robust video features including 4K and audio inputs.
- You’re okay carrying a larger camera but want excellent ergonomics and an EVF for shooting precision.
- Budget allows for about $1400 investment and you expect a reliable, long-term workhorse.
Both cameras have their charm and place in the photographic ecosystem. The TG-850 is the thrill-seeker’s trusty sidekick; the RX10 III is the contemplative pro’s Swiss Army knife in your camera kit.
I hope this comparison, grounded in thorough testing and practical insights, helps you plot your photographic course. Whichever you choose, remember that it’s not just what you own - it’s how you use it that shapes your images.
Happy shooting!
END
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lb) | 1051 grams (2.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 420 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $250 | $1,398 |