Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2008
- New Model is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus TG-870 and Sony A200, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-870 was manufactured 7 years later than the A200 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the TG-870 grades versus the A200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony A200
TG-870 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | ![]() | July 2008 | Fresher by 91 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus TG-870
A200 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony A200
TG-870 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-870 and Sony A200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-870 versus the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af15/7af15c08e906ff233a330769f2891029255b2780" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and A200 is 91 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0195c/0195c6fad2e7547f0cdff7eda576c42afe4775d0" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and A200.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-870 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus TG-870 will give extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer TG-870 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d81/41d8153f21e60321549e3f71c9b0f63df063348b" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45875/45875cb4d22587bd0d3c11476ab457af090a3112" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 572 gr (1.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $280 | $100 |