Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A230
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
69 Imaging
50 Features
40 Overall
46
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A230 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony A230, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and A230 (10MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-870 was revealed 6 years later than the A230 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TG-870 matches up vs the A230 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A230 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A230. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Sony A230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony A230
| TG-870 | A230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 81 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus TG-870
| A230 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony A230
| TG-870 | A230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 offers external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony A230 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") and a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony A230 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-870 compared to the A230.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and A230 is 91 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The graphic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and A230.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-870 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-870 will provide greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-870 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A230 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2016-01-06 | 2009-05-18 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 490 grams (1.08 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 230 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $280 | $569 |
