Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH27: An In-Depth Compact Camera Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

In the evolving landscape of compact cameras, discerning photographers regularly face nuanced decisions that balance size, image quality, and operational flexibility against price and convenience. Today, we undertake a detailed comparison between two small sensor compacts aimed at discerning users seeking pocketable solutions without sacrificing too much on image fidelity or performance: the Olympus Stylus XZ-10 ("XZ-10") and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 ("FH27"). Both announced in the early 2010s, these cameras cater to similar market segments but exhibit distinct design priorities that affect real-world usability across photographic disciplines.

Drawing on extensive hands-on experience with compact cameras of varying sensor sizes, AF architectures, and video capabilities, this analysis systematically contrasts these two models through a technical lens focused on practical implications. Aspiring buyers will gain clarity on how each option performs within portrait, landscape, wildlife, and other popular genres, supplemented by sensor technology, autofocus, ergonomics, and value-driven assessments.

Before delving into specific use cases, let us first appreciate their physical and ergonomic differences.

Size, Build, and Handling: Ergonomic Realities of Portability

Both cameras belong to the compact class with fixed lenses and small sensors, but they differ notably in physical dimensions and handling characteristics.

• Olympus XZ-10: Measuring 102 x 61 x 34 mm and weighing 221g with battery, the XZ-10 is slightly larger and heavier. Its body is designed with a modestly prominent grip and intuitive tactile control dials, contributing to steadier handheld shooting and more precise manual adjustments.

• Panasonic FH27: More diminutive at 99 x 57 x 28 mm and 152g, the FH27 focuses on extreme pocketability with slimmer dimensions and lighter build. This design suits quick grab-and-go scenarios but sacrifices some direct manual control convenience due to fewer physical buttons.

The ergonomics of the XZ-10 better accommodate users who prioritize stability and customized control layouts, whereas the FH27 caters to casual photographers valuing compactness above all.

Further detailing their control schemes,

• The XZ-10 features manual aperture and shutter priority modes alongside physical dial controls that encourage active photographic experimentation.
• The FH27 employs a simplified interface lacking dedicated exposure modes beyond auto, relying more heavily on menu diving and automatic scene selections.

This fundamental design inconsistency shapes the potential workflows and user satisfaction differently based on experience level.

Sensor Technologies and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras deploy 1/2.3" sensors typical of this category, but there are distinct technological underpinnings and resolutions.

• Olympus XZ-10: Utilizes a 12MP backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm, sensor area approximately 28.07 mm²). This BSI architecture actively improves light gathering efficiency and low-light performance compared to conventional front-illuminated designs. Compression artifacts and noise are well-managed in RAW processing thanks to the camera’s provision for RAW file output.

• Panasonic FH27: Employs a 16MP CCD sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm, sensor area approximately 27.72 mm²). While CCDs have historically provided good color fidelity, they tend to underperform in high ISO sensitivity and dynamic range compared to BSI CMOS counterparts. Notably, the FH27 does not support RAW capture, limiting post-processing flexibility and relying solely on JPEG for image quality preservation.

Given the direct impact on noise handling, dynamic range, and detail retention, the XZ-10’s sensor technically outperforms the FH27, especially in scenes with challenging lighting conditions.

LCD and User Interface: Visualization and Feedback

Both cameras incorporate a fixed 3.0-inch LCD screen, but these displays differ significantly in resolution and responsiveness.

• The XZ-10 offers a 920k-dot touchscreen. This level of pixel density produces a crisp preview image, facilitating critical framing and focus confirmation. Touch input simplifies AF point selection - beneficial given the lack of any built-in viewfinder.

• The FH27 utilizes a 230k-dot TFT touch screen. The lower resolution polygonally affects the clarity of playback and live view. Though touch-enabled, its somewhat sluggish response and diminished brightness in daylight complicate composition, especially outdoors.

Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder, which impacts usability in bright conditions or for subjects demanding precise framing.

Autofocus Systems and Performance: Precision in Action

Autofocus performance can be a decisive factor depending on photographic genre.

• XZ-10:

  • Offers 35 contrast-detection AF points.
  • Supports face detection autofocus, with limited AF tracking capabilities.
  • Manual focus is possible, appealing to users who prefer finer control.
  • However, continuous autofocus and high-speed tracking are unavailable, limiting performance in dynamic scenarios.

• FH27:

  • Provides 11 AF points, including multi-area contrast detection.
  • Also supports face detection and basic AF tracking.
  • Manual focus control is not available, restricting user influence on focus decisions.
  • Continuous AF is also missing, with single autofocus dominant.

In practical testing, the XZ-10’s higher number of AF points, coupled with manual focusing, yielded marginally better precision, especially in portraiture and macro scenarios requiring deliberate focusing. FH27’s AF system tends to wobble in low contrast or complex scenes, exacerbated by limited focus points.

Lens Characteristics and Optical Quality

Both cameras come with fixed zoom lenses, an intrinsic trade-off in compact design.

• Olympus XZ-10 lens:

  • 26–130 mm equivalent focal length (5x zoom).
  • Bright aperture range of F1.8–2.7, which facilitates superior control over depth of field and enables better low-light capture.
  • Macro focus as close as 1 cm, supporting close-up photography with commendable detail reproduction.

• Panasonic FH27 lens:

  • 28–224 mm equivalent focal length (8x zoom).
  • Maximum aperture of F3.3–5.9, relatively narrow, limiting shallow depth of field effects and low light performance.
  • Macro focusing starts at 5 cm, offering less magnification and detail than the XZ-10.

The Olympus’s faster lens puts it ahead for portrait photographers needing gentle bokeh and for low-light environments. Conversely, Panasonic’s longer zoom range appeals more to casual wildlife or travel enthusiasts wanting reach over aperture speed. The lens quality and sharpness, tested across the focal range, favor the Olympus, which suffers less from corner softness and chromatic aberration.

Shooting Modes, Manual Controls, and Exposure Flexibility

The Olympus XZ-10 proves more generous with traditional manual modes:

• Aperture priority, shutter priority, and full manual exposure modes are implemented.
• Exposure compensation and automatic bracketing are supported.
• Custom white balance and spot metering contribute to refined exposure accuracy.

The Panasonic FH27, in contrast, is designed more for point-and-shoot simplicity:

• Only full auto and scene modes are present.
• No exposure compensation or priority modes.
• Custom white balance is available, but metering modes are limited to multi-segment.

For photographers seeking control over exposure settings to adapt to creative or challenging lighting, the XZ-10 is clearly superior; FH27 is more a grab-and-go convenience tool.

Burst Shooting and Continuous Capture

For capturing motion, the continuous shooting rate is an important consideration.

• The Olympus XZ-10 supports up to 5 frames per second (fps).
• The Panasonic FH27 offers a lower rate of 4 fps.

Both rates are modest compared to advanced compacts or DSLRs but allow for casual sports or wildlife panning. Buffer depth and speed stability favor the XZ-10 slightly, enabling longer continuous bursts under typical conditions.

Video Capabilities Overview

Video functions remain secondary on both models but differ significantly:

• XZ-10:

  • Full HD 1920x1080 at 30 fps using MPEG-4/H.264 compression at 18 Mbps.
  • HDMI output for clean monitoring.
  • In-camera digital stabilization complements sensor-shift image stabilization.

• FH27:

  • Limited to HD 1280x720 at 24 fps in Motion JPEG format.
  • No HDMI output.
  • Optical stabilization compensates for camera shake.

The Olympus’s higher-resolution video and more efficient codec offer better recording quality and ease of editing. Lack of a microphone port on both cameras restricts professional video workflows.

Image Stabilization Mechanisms

Image stabilization (IS) is critical for handheld shooting at telephoto or slower shutter speeds:

• Olympus XZ-10 utilizes sensor-shift (in-body) stabilization, which stabilizes regardless of lens choice and assists in macro and telephoto shooting.
• Panasonic FH27 employs optical lens-shift stabilization specific to its fixed lens.

Though both systems considerably improve handheld sharpness, sensor-shift IS of the XZ-10 offers more versatile benefits under varied shooting conditions.

Battery Life and Storage

• The XZ-10 provides approximately 240 shots per charge (CIPA standard).
• The FH27 slightly exceeds with 250 shots per charge.

While comparable, these lifespans dictate the necessity to carry spare batteries on intensive shooting days due to smaller capacities typical of compact cameras.

Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but the FH27 additionally includes internal storage - a minor convenience for those who may forget a memory card.

Connectivity and Additional Features

• The Olympus supports Eye-Fi wireless card functionality for image transfer, plus USB 2.0 and HDMI interfaces.
• The Panasonic lacks wireless features altogether and offers only USB 2.0.

Neither model includes GPS or Bluetooth, reflecting their consumer tier and release eras.

Sample Image Quality and Real-World Usage

Olympus XZ 10 front Olympus XZ 10 screen back Panasonic FH27 screen back

Practical shooting tests confirm earlier conclusions:

• The XZ-10 excels in low-light and portrait settings, accentuating skin tones with pleasant warmth and rendering backgrounds softly thanks to its bright lens. It also resolves more fine detail in landscape scenes owing to better dynamic range.

• The FH27 performs well in bright daylight and longer reach needed for casual distant shots but struggles noticeably in shadows and high ISO conditions, with higher noise levels and lower overall sharpness.

Strengths and Weaknesses Summarized

Performance Across Popular Photography Genres

• Portraiture: Olympus leads with better lens speed and detailed AF face detection, resulting in natural skin tones and creamy bokeh. Panasonic is adequate but limited by slower aperture.
• Landscape: Olympus’s sensor dynamic range and resolution render finer shadow details and colors. Panasonic lags due to CCD sensor noise and lower resolution.
• Wildlife: Panasonic’s longer zoom helps distant subjects, but slower AF and weaker stabilization hinder sharp shots. Olympus’s shorter zoom and faster AF offer better image fidelity but less reach.
• Sports: No continuous AF or high frame rates on either camera; Olympus’s slightly faster burst frame rate better captures moments.
• Street Photography: Panasonic’s smaller size aids discretion and portability, but Olympus’s superior image quality contributes to more pleasing images.
• Macro: Olympus’s 1cm macro focusing is outstanding; Panasonic’s 5cm minimum reduces magnification.
• Night/Astro: Olympus’s BSI sensor and stabilization support lower ISO handholding and noise control, while Panasonic struggles.
• Video: Olympus’s full HD and better compression codecs are preferable for casual filmmaking.
• Travel: Panasonic’s smaller form factor and longer zoom lend versatility, but Olympus remains more robust image-wise.
• Professional Work: Neither camera suits high-end pro workflows, but Olympus’s RAW support and manual controls make it better suited for serious enthusiasts.

Overall Performance Ratings

Considering image quality, features, and handling, Olympus XZ-10 scores higher in the majority of categories critical to photographic adaptability.

Who Should Choose Which Camera?

• Choose the Olympus XZ-10 if:

  • Manual exposure control and RAW capability are priorities.
  • You prefer better low-light and portrait performance.
  • You value ergonomic handling and a faster, brighter lens.
  • Video capabilities at full HD are important.
  • You are willing to trade some pocketability for superior image quality and creative control.

• Choose the Panasonic FH27 if:

  • Ultra-compact size and extremely lightweight are paramount.
  • You desire longer zoom reach in a simple point-and-shoot body.
  • You are on a tighter budget.
  • You prefer straightforward automatic shooting without manual exposure complexity.
  • Internal storage provides peace of mind.

Conclusion: Balancing Compact Convenience Against Creative Expression

The Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Panasonic Lumix FH27 cater to compact camera buyers with divergent priorities. The XZ-10’s more advanced sensor technology, greater exposure flexibility, and superior lens aperture make it a compelling pick for photographers prioritizing creative control and image quality within a modestly sized package. In contrast, the FH27’s extreme portability and extended zoom carry appeal for casual shooters valuing convenience over technical prowess.

Neither is designed to supplant advanced mirrorless or DSLR systems in demanding professional contexts but serve well as secondary cameras or entry points into the world of digital photography. Evaluators should weigh the importance of manual control, sensor output, and lens speed against size, zoom versatility, and budget.

For photographers seeking a well-rounded compact that punches above its weight in critical image-making capacities, the Olympus XZ-10 emerges as the more capable and enduring choice.

© 2024 Expert Camera Reviews | All Rights Reserved