Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS25
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Panasonic FS25, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-10 was manufactured 4 years later than the FS25 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the XZ-10 matches up against the FS25 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Panasonic FS25
| XZ-10 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus XZ-10
| FS25 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FS25
| XZ-10 | FS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Panasonic FS25 has specifications of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-10 versus Panasonic FS25 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the FS25.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and FS25 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and FS25.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos however you should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The fresher XZ-10 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2009-01-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 148 gr (0.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $428 | $230 |