Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The XZ-10 was brought out 2 years later than the FX75 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the XZ-10 scores versus the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Panasonic FX75
XZ-10 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 33 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus XZ-10
FX75 | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FX75
XZ-10 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 provides outer measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90c9c/90c9cbd72d81301e8a8704e20f9c3542f80b9915" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and FX75 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23583/2358376416d151b93898b6b35a6333f66b709b02" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and FX75.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Panasonic FX75 to offer you more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9b23/f9b237232ada21fbd734d2a3b2013a8c9aa52411" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fd74/6fd74edeb77ba28ec8c30f64a6b461a0a05ec6bc" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $428 | $139 |