Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce26f/ce26f126ddb897ecf80630f38a706a60c1b9d696" alt="Samsung NX30 front Samsung NX30 front"
75 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Superseded the Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NX30 (20MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NX30 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The XZ-10 was announced 11 months prior to the NX30 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX30 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the XZ-10 grades against the NX30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Samsung NX30. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Samsung NX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung NX30
XZ-10 | NX30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX30 over the Olympus XZ-10
NX30 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 11 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung NX30
XZ-10 | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung NX30 has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") with a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 against the NX30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec632/ec63275d74ee7a74023eefa59bc896fc5db6a312" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and NX30 is 91 and 75 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac17d/ac17d2c1d925d3a086d78c0d63539831ee9959cb" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual below should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and NX30.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX30 will provide greater detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older XZ-10 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/167bd/167bdd632b5b414b143906a2346eceab267ca437" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5dd2/f5dd2cbc587aa4e4611179954a106b9d2520a1f6" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung NX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung NX30 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-01-30 | 2014-01-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIMeIV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.66x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 375 grams (0.83 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1014 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 360 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | BP1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $428 | $699 |