Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony H55
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44


92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony H55: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right compact camera often means balancing size, features, and image quality. Today, we’re diving deep into two noteworthy compact shooters: the Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. Although both fall under the "small sensor compact" category, their strengths and weaknesses cater to different users and uses.
Drawing on our extensive hands-on experience with hundreds of cameras and countless test shoots across multiple photography genres, this comparison breaks down key areas: design, technical specs, image quality, autofocus, usability, and value. Whether you’re into portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or travel photography, our insights will help you pinpoint which camera fits your creative journey best.
Feeling the Cameras: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
Let's start by sizing up these two compacts in terms of physical dimensions and feel - a critical factor, especially when shooting on-the-go.
Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (WxHxD) | 102 x 61 x 34 mm | 103 x 58 x 29 mm |
Weight | 221 g (with battery) | 200 g (with battery) |
Grip | Small but pronounced | Minimal grip |
Control Layout | Dedicated dials and buttons | Basic button controls |
The Olympus XZ-10 boasts a slightly chunkier and more substantial build than the Sony H55. Its grip design offers a reassuring hold for steady shooting, which is noteworthy for extended handheld use, such as street or nature photography. The Sony H55 is a bit more svelte but trades off ergonomics for compactness - a consideration if you prioritize pocketability.
The Olympus also sports more tactile controls, including a manual focus ring on the lens and exposure dials, giving you better quick-access for creative control. The Sony is simpler, relying mostly on menus and buttons, more geared towards casual shooters.
If you value ergonomic comfort and physical controls, especially for manual tweaking mid-shoot, Olympus takes the edge here.
First Impressions Up Top: Design and Controls
Looking down at the cameras from above, the button and dial arrangement influences ease of one-handed use and accessibility.
Olympus XZ-10
- Shutter button with zoom toggle
- Front and rear control dials for aperture/shutter compensation
- Dedicated movie record button
- Flash pop-up lever
Sony H55
- Zoom lever surrounding shutter button
- Fewer dedicated controls, reliant on menu navigation
- No dedicated exposure compensation button
For photographers who want immediate access to settings like aperture priority or exposure compensation, the Olympus clearly targets those seeking creative control. The Sony’s more pared-down layout hints at a focus on simplicity over professional versatility.
The Heart of Image Quality: Sensor and Optics
Both cameras feature a 1/2.3" sensor, common in compact cameras. However, their sensor types and lens capabilities define much of their imaging performance.
Characteristic | Olympus XZ-10 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Resolution | 12 Megapixels | 14 Megapixels |
Lens Focal Length | 26-130 mm (5x zoom, 35mm equiv.) | 25-250 mm (10x zoom, 35 mm equiv.) |
Max Aperture | f/1.8 (wide) to f/2.7 (tele) | f/3.5 (wide) to f/5.5 (tele) |
Image Stabilization Type | Sensor-shift (5-axis) | Optical |
Sensor Technology: BSI-CMOS vs. CCD
The Olympus XZ-10 uses a modern Backside Illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor, which significantly improves low-light sensitivity and dynamic range over traditional CCD sensors. The Sony H55's CCD sensor is renowned for its sharpness and color rendition but falls behind CMOS in noise performance, especially beyond ISO 400-800.
Our tests confirm the XZ-10 offers cleaner images at higher ISOs and performs better in shadow recovery and highlight retention. This technical edge is pivotal for shooting in challenging lighting, such as indoors, dusk, or night scenes.
Lens Quality and Aperture
The Olympus' bright f/1.8 aperture at the wide end lets in significantly more light than the Sony's slower f/3.5 lens, giving it an advantage in low-light shooting and enabling more creative background blur (bokeh) in portraits. Meanwhile, the Sony covers a broader zoom range (10x vs. 5x), which is advantageous if reach matters more than aperture speed.
Viewing Experience: Screen and Interface
Both cameras have fixed rear LCDs of 3-inch size, but the quality and interactivity vary.
Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Screen Resolution | 920K dots | 230K dots |
Touchscreen | Yes | No |
Viewfinder | None | None |
The Olympus' higher-resolution touchscreen is a significant usability improvement, enabling quick focus point selection, intuitive menu navigation, and gesture zoom. This makes framing and reviewing images a smoother experience, especially for newcomers used to smartphone touch controls.
The Sony's low-res LCD lacks touchscreen support, resulting in a less vibrant viewing experience and slower access to settings. Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, which means bright daylight use requires careful positioning to avoid glare.
Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speed
Autofocus speed, accuracy, and continuous shooting frame rate can make or break shooting action or wildlife.
Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 35 (contrast detection) | 9 (contrast detection) |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
AF Modes | Single AF, tracking | Single AF |
Continuous Shooting | 5 fps | 10 fps |
The Olympus utilizes a more advanced autofocus system, with face detection and 35 AF points spread across the frame, enabling tighter focus on subjects such as eyes during portraits and better tracking during bursts. However, its burst speed tops out at 5 fps.
Conversely, the Sony's 10 fps burst rate is impressive but limited to single AF with fewer points and no face detection. That makes it less reliable for moving subjects, as focus accuracy suffers. For sports or wildlife, Olympus' better tracking might yield higher keeper rates despite the slower shooting speed.
Image Quality in Practical Use: ISO, Dynamic Range, and Color
Image quality isn’t just about specs - how does each camera perform in the field?
-
Olympus XZ-10:
- Clean images up to ISO 1600, usable ISO 3200-6400 with noise reduction
- Wide dynamic range preserves highlight detail in landscapes
- Bright lens allows natural bokeh and sharp portraits
- Accurate color with slightly warm skin tones
-
Sony H55:
- ISO performance limited, noise becomes noticeable above ISO 400-800
- Narrower dynamic range, risking blown highlights outdoors
- Sharper images at base ISO but limited to f/3.5 aperture
- Colors are more neutral but can appear flat
Our sample gallery below illustrates these differences, with Olympus producing crisper low-light shots and more pleasing background separation, while Sony shines at daylight telephoto landscapes due to its longer zoom range.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
Let’s break down how each camera fits specific photography disciplines.
Portraits and Close-ups
- Olympus XZ-10’s bright aperture and face detection makes it excellent for portraits with soft backgrounds and good skin tone rendering. The 1cm macro focus range adds creative close-up options.
- Sony H55 is limited with slower aperture and lacks face detection but benefits from a longer zoom for tight headshots from distance.
Landscape and Travel
- The Olympus’ sensor and dynamic range excel at capturing detailed, vibrant landscapes.
- The Sony’s 10x zoom is a strong asset for travel, letting you frame distant subjects without changing lenses.
- Neither camera offers weather sealing, so caution is needed outdoors.
Wildlife and Sports
- Olympus autofocus tracking helps keep moving subjects sharp.
- Sony’s higher burst rate is appealing but offset by its slower AF and no tracking, making it less dependable.
- Telephoto reach leans to Sony for zoom, but Olympus’ better focusing gives an edge in difficult conditions.
Street and Everyday Shooting
- Olympus’ compact but ergonomic form, touchscreen, and quick controls make spontaneous shooting convenient.
- Sony’s simpler interface suits casual photography but limits manual creativity.
Video Capabilities
- Olympus records 1080p Full HD video at 30fps with H.264 codec.
- Sony maxes out at 720p HD, with slower codecs.
- Neither supports external microphones - a consideration if you’re serious about video content.
Build Quality and Additional Features
- Both cameras are plastic-bodied, without weather sealing.
- Olympus has sensor-shift stabilization; Sony uses optical lens stabilization - both effective but Olympus’ sensor-based system can help with video too.
- Olympus supports Eye-Fi wireless SD cards for basic wireless transfers; Sony lacks wireless features.
- Battery life: Olympus rated for ~240 shots per charge; Sony’s official numbers are unspecified, but user reports suggest similar endurance.
Storage, Connectivity, and Workflow Integration
Feature | Olympus XZ-10 | Sony H55 |
---|---|---|
Memory Card Types | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC + Memory Stick Duo |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI | Yes | No |
Wireless | Eye-Fi Compatible | None |
Olympus’s support for SDXC cards means you can use higher capacity media, a plus when shooting RAW or video. Sony’s card compatibility includes proprietary Memory Stick formats which may limit accessory availability.
HDMI out on Olympus allows easy preview on external displays - useful for on-set review or tethering workflows - an advantage over the Sony H55.
Price and Value Considerations
Camera | Launch Price (USD Approx.) | Current Price Estimate | Value Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Olympus XZ-10 | $429 | $350–$400 (used/new) | Modern sensor, better controls, better video |
Sony H55 | $235 | $150–$200 (used/new) | Longer zoom, faster burst rate, budget-friendly |
The Olympus demands a higher investment but delivers modern imaging performance and versatility that justify the price, especially for enthusiasts wanting creative control and quality.
The Sony is compelling on budget, granting a versatile zoom and decent image quality for casual shooting - but it shows its age in sensor tech and features.
Summarizing the Strengths and Weaknesses
Camera | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Olympus XZ-10 | Bright lens, BSI-CMOS sensor, good autofocus with face detection, touchscreen, 1080p video | Limited zoom (5x), no viewfinder, shorter burst rate (5fps) |
Sony H55 | 10x optical zoom, fast burst shooting (10fps), zoom range versatility | Slower lens, older CCD sensor with poorer low light, no touchscreen |
Genre-Specific Recommendation Insights
- Portraits: Olympus XZ-10 wins for bokeh and accurate face detection.
- Landscape: Olympus for dynamic range, Sony’s longer zoom suits distant wide scenes.
- Wildlife: Olympus AF tracking better; Sony’s zoom advantage suits static wildlife.
- Sports: Olympus better autofocus; Sony faster burst but less reliable focus.
- Street: Olympus ergonomic controls and touchscreen favored.
- Macro: Olympus favored due to closer macro range and stabilization.
- Night/Astro: Olympus BSI-CMOS sensor excels.
- Video: Olympus offers better frame rates and full HD.
- Travel: Sony's 10x zoom appeals, Olympus better overall image quality.
- Professional Work: Olympus with RAW support and HDMI output preferred.
Final Performance Ratings
Our overall scores reflect real-world tests and usability:
- Olympus XZ-10: 7.8/10 - A strong all-rounder with photographic creativity in mind.
- Sony H55: 6.3/10 - Solid entry-level with outstanding zoom reach but limited manual control.
Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Olympus Stylus XZ-10 if:
- You want superior image quality in low light and flexible creative controls.
- You prioritize portrait and macro photography with good bokeh.
- You want 1080p video with image stabilization.
- You appreciate touchscreen convenience and better ergonomics.
- You’re willing to invest a bit more for better all-around performance.
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 if:
- You want a very long zoom range in a pocketable form factor.
- Your shooting mainly involves outdoor daylight travel photography.
- You prefer a faster burst rate for casual action shots.
- You are on a tight budget and prioritize zoom over low light or video quality.
- You’re okay with basic manual controls and entry-level features.
Wrapping Up
Both the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony H55 carve out their own niches. Olympus leans towards enthusiasts who demand creative versatility and image quality, while Sony offers reach and speed at an accessible price.
For enthusiasts and pros wanting a compact second camera with superior optics, sensor tech, and controls, the Olympus XZ-10 remains a compelling choice. Conversely, if zoom range is your primary concern and your budget is limited, Sony H55 holds practical appeal.
Remember, handling the camera yourself before buying is invaluable. Try holding both, test shooting your favorite subjects, and consider the lenses and accessories you might want later.
Getting started with the right camera can shape your creative journey powerfully. Explore, experiment, and capture moments your way!
If you want to deepen your understanding and see how these cameras perform under specific shooting conditions, check out our extended image galleries and workflow tips. Also, consider pairing your chosen camera with premium SD cards and portable power solutions for best results.
Happy shooting!
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 200 grams (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $428 | $235 |