Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f26/a0f260975b7fd3cfd965df18bc5d1244f1cf70fb" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Launched January 2015
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS45
- Successor is Panasonic ZS60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZS50, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the ZS50 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-320 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the ZS50 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-320 matches up versus the ZS50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic ZS50
TG-320 | ZS50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus TG-320
ZS50 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 36 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZS50
TG-320 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-320 offers physical dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS50 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic ZS50 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-320 compared to the ZS50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b87d9/b87d9382117752d32c86e8b1603895bcb9ab214d" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and ZS50 is 94 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/654ef/654ef11ae5d7013b3d1ea9d8d119a6db7b865421" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-320 and ZS50.
As you can tell, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-320 to offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a288/8a288c067893067efb9df33c2fff0de33ffbb61c" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6edb9/6edb92f8d14f9d9cf8e9ef9062e99ae15426f10b" alt="Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 243 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 300 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $0 | $350 |