Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-4
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus TG-320 versus Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-320 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-320 grades versus the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Ricoh WG-4
| TG-320 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus TG-320
| WG-4 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Ricoh WG-4
| TG-320 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-320 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-320 compared to the WG-4.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-320 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and WG-4.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 to resolve more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The older TG-320 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography info
MP count decent (14MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
slow frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (150 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (240 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
environment sealing
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery (150 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
weather proofing
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery (240 CIPA)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography highlights
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
terrible battery (150 shots)
lack of Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
weather proofing
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
not so great battery (240 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging advice
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging advice
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-320 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | 240 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $0 | $330 |