Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-330
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Olympus VR-330, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-630 iHS was manufactured 24 months later than the VR-330 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the TG-630 iHS matches up versus the VR-330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus VR-330
| TG-630 iHS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| VR-330 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Olympus VR-330
| TG-630 iHS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-630 iHS has outside dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-630 iHS compared to the VR-330.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and VR-330 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-630 iHS and VR-330.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-330 to offer you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-630 iHS will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus TG-630 iHS | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $200 | $220 |