Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-630 iHS was revealed very close to the XZ-2 iHS and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-630 iHS matches up against the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-630 iHS | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
XZ-2 iHS | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-630 iHS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | Same age |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-630 iHS features outside measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-630 iHS versus the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5e40/e5e40e83509273da83bec07e41edb42ab4fefe64" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-630 iHS and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68093/68093ba7a9036c48bf2493728c6e85be438fb664" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-630 iHS and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor sizing. The TG-630 iHS contains the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fe3a/0fe3af2a7e9a2601d5f80847864d5ecd69a7ae63" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e28f/7e28fbd2d178c8c0b4c7919a45356bfe228d5817" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 340 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $200 | $450 |