Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-630 iHS was announced 6 years prior to the ZS200 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the TG-630 iHS scores versus the ZS200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-630 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Panasonic ZS200
TG-630 iHS | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
ZS200 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | January 2013 | More modern by 62 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 1240k | 460k | Crisper display (+780k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Panasonic ZS200
TG-630 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-630 iHS enjoys outside dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the TG-630 iHS compared to the ZS200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-630 iHS and ZS200 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-630 iHS and ZS200.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-630 iHS using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged TG-630 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 370 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $200 | $800 |