Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX1
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
66 Imaging
67 Features
90 Overall
76
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 550g - 139 x 102 x 66mm
- Introduced September 2014
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX1 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Samsung NX1, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-630 iHS (12MP) and NX1 (28MP) and the TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") and NX1 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-630 iHS was released 20 months earlier than the NX1 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-630 iHS scores against the NX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Samsung NX1
TG-630 iHS | NX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
NX1 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | January 2013 | Newer by 20 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1036k | 460k | Crisper display (+576k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-630 iHS and Samsung NX1
TG-630 iHS | NX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-630 iHS provides external dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung NX1 has sizing of 139mm x 102mm x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-630 iHS versus Samsung NX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-630 iHS versus the NX1.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-630 iHS and NX1 is 94 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-630 iHS and NX1.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-630 iHS because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX1 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 16 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-630 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-630 iHS vs Samsung NX1 Specifications
Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung NX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-630 iHS | Samsung NX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2014-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 28 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6480 x 4320 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 209 |
Cross type focus points | - | 153 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,036 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 15.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 11.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.265 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | 550 gr (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 139 x 102 x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1363 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 500 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BP1900 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $200 | $1,500 |