Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus VG-160
Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
Olympus TG-810
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus TG-810 and Olympus VG-160, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-810 (14MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-810 was launched 4 months before the VG-160 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-810 grades vs the VG-160 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-810 and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-810 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus VG-160
| TG-810 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus TG-810
| VG-160 | TG-810 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Olympus VG-160
| TG-810 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | January 2012 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-810 has got external dimensions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-810 and Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-810 compared to the VG-160.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-810 and VG-160 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-810 and VG-160.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you need to take the release date of the cameras into account.
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-810 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography advice
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
good megapixels (14MP)
includes face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-810 Street photography highlights
Olympus VG-160 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus TG-810 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery (220 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low battery life (165 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-810 Travel photography factors
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography factors
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
bad battery (220 shots)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low battery life (165 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-810 Landscape photography information
Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography information
reasonably wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
weather sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery (220 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
quite wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery life (165 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-810 Vlogging advice
Olympus VG-160 Vlogging advice
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
quite wide (26mm)
includes face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (125g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-810 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus TG-810 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus TG-810 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 165 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $428 | $90 |