Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS100
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37


87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Released January 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ100
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS200

Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100: A Hands-On Dive Into Two Distinct Compact Cameras
Choosing the right compact camera can feel like navigating a maze - with every brand touting the latest features, how do you separate marketing fluff from practical value? Today, I'm diving deep into two intriguing contenders from different eras and design philosophies: the Olympus TG-810, a rugged waterproof shooter aimed at adventurers, announced back in 2011, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (also known as the TZ100), a more recent 2016 large-sensor compact geared to enthusiasts craving versatility and image quality.
At first glance, pitting a tough little adventure buddy against a more refined travel zoom might seem a bit like comparing apples to… well, waterproof oranges. But as someone who’s tested thousands of cameras, I find these contrasts fascinating because they reveal a lot about how camera technology evolves - and what actually impacts your day-to-day shooting experience.
So buckle up for a 2500-word ride where we will dissect everything from sensor performance to handling, autofocus prowess to video features, and beyond. Spoiler alert: Whether you're a rugged outdoors explorer or a thirsty travel photographer, understanding these two cameras' strengths and quirks will help you make an informed choice that really suits how you shoot.
1. Size, Build, and Handling: Toughness vs. Sophistication
I’ve always believed that a camera’s physicality communicates its soul. The Olympus TG-810 wears its ruggedness on its sleeve (or rubber body armor). It’s designed for waterlogged adventures, dust storms, freezing weather - basically, if Murphy’s Law applies, this camera laughs in the rain.
On the other end, the Panasonic ZS100 exudes a more sophisticated vibe, with a classic compact camera shape - slightly larger but more refined, offering tactile controls and a pop-up electronic viewfinder. Let's see those differences in action:
At 100x65x26 mm and weighing a mere 215 grams, the Olympus TG-810 is delightfully pocketable and feels like a sturdy companion you can toss into a backpack without hesitation. Its textured rubberized grip and sealed buttons assure you that moisture and dust won’t short-circuit your memories.
The Panasonic ZS100 is chunkier (111x65x44 mm, 312 grams), reflecting its larger, more capable sensor and longer zoom lens. The body uses more metal and quality plastics, giving it heft and a premium feel. The inclusion of an electronic viewfinder (EVF) adds thickness but delivers composure in bright daylight imaging where LCD screens falter.
Looking at the control layout, the ZS100 embraces enthusiast-style ergonomics: dedicated dials for aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation, plus a customizable function button and touch-sensitive screen. The Olympus TG-810 has a simpler interface, befitting its rugged use-case, with fewer buttons and no manual exposure modes.
Ergonomics takeaway: The TG-810 excels in environments where resilience matters most. If you want intuitive physical controls and manual exposure creativity, the ZS100’s design and layout will win your heart.
2. Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
If there's one feature that fundamentally shapes the quality of your pictures, it's the sensor. I always approach sensor comparisons armed with test charts, field shooting, and pixel-peeping to uncover the truth.
The two cameras couldn’t be more different here:
- Olympus TG-810: 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.17x4.55 mm), 14 megapixels, max native ISO 1600.
- Panasonic ZS100: 1-inch MOS sensor (13.2x8.8 mm), 20 megapixels, max native ISO 12800 with boosted ISO 25600.
The TG-810 uses a small, older CCD sensor technology, which was common in compact cameras a decade ago. While it’s capable of capturing decent JPEGs in good light, dynamic range is limited, and noise levels spike quickly past ISO 400. This sensor size constrains detail resolution and low-light performance.
The ZS100’s 1-inch sensor is more than four times the surface area of the TG-810's, translating into fundamentally better image quality, especially in challenging lighting. The MOS sensor architecture combined with the Venus Engine processor delivers richer colors, wider dynamic range (as validated by DXOMark’s 12.5 EV score), and cleaner high-ISO images. The availability of RAW support is a huge bonus for enthusiasts seeking maximum post-processing latitude.
This isn’t just theory: shooting landscapes and street scenes side by side, the ZS100’s files reveal more nuanced shadows, punchier highlights, and a generally cleaner look - even handheld at night.
3. Lens Capabilities: Zoom Ranges and Apertures in Depth
From my experience, zoom versatility and optical quality are the real workhorses in compact cameras.
- Olympus TG-810 offers a 5x zoom spanning 28-140mm equivalent, with a maximum aperture range of f/3.9-5.9.
- Panasonic ZS100 sports a 10x zoom stretching 25-250mm equivalent, starting brighter at f/2.8 at the wide end and narrowing to f/5.9 at full zoom.
That means the ZS100 handles a wider variety of shooting scenarios - from wide open landscapes to close-ups of distant subjects like wildlife or architecture. The brighter wide aperture on this camera also helps in low-light environments and provides slightly creamier bokeh for portraits.
The TG-810's lens isn’t a slouch either; it’s sharp in the center, though at the telephoto end, expect softness and diffraction limiting fine detail, especially when stopped down.
Macro lovers take note: with a close-focus distance of just 3 cm, the TG-810 is surprisingly adept at near subjects in tough conditions. The ZS100 allows 5 cm macro shooting, which is respectable but not as close.
4. Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus (AF) systems can make or break your chances when capturing fleeting moments - trust me, frustration mounts quickly when AF hunts or misses in critical seconds.
The TG-810 features a contrast-detect AF system with face detection and multi-area AF. It lacks continuous AF and manual focus options, relying on a single AF mode with limited focus points. In practice, this system is effective under bright daylight situations but slows down considerably when light dims or contrast falls off - sometimes giving that agonizing lag during wildlife photography or shooting moving objects.
Contrast that with the ZS100, which has a much more advanced contrast-detect AF with 49 points, selective AF, continuous AF, and face detection. It also supports touch-to-focus on the LCD screen, providing precise and swift subject acquisition. In real-world testing, the ZS100’s continuous tracking keeps up much better with moving subjects, essential for sports or street photography.
5. Video Features: More Than Just Stills
A camera’s video capabilities have become an increasingly vital hallmark of versatility. Let’s look at what these two can offer:
-
TG-810: Records HD video at 1280x720 pixels at 30 fps. Video formats include MPEG-4 and H.264. Basic video functionality with no microphone or headphone jacks, no 4K, and no advanced stabilization during video.
-
ZS100: Delivers impressive 4K UHD video at 3840x2160 pixels up to 30p, plus Full HD at up to 60p. Includes Panasonic’s renowned 5-axis optical image stabilization, enabling smoother handheld footage. Also features 4K Photo mode - letting you extract 8MP still frames from video - a brilliant tool for action and street photographers. No external audio ports, so audio quality is limited to onboard mic.
If you’re serious about casual filmmaking or want to future-proof your videos, the ZS100 is the clear winner here.
6. User Interface and Display: Interaction Matters
User experience goes way beyond specs. The way a camera feels in your hands and interacts with your intentions can make the difference between a cluttered, frustrating shooting session and a seamless creative flow.
Both cameras have a 3-inch LCD screen, but with some notable differences:
The TG-810 sports a 3-inch TFT Hypercrystal III LCD with 920k-dot resolution. It’s fixed (non-articulated) but performs well outdoors thanks to hyper-crystal technology's improved brightness and clarity.
The ZS100 comes equipped with a slightly higher resolution 1040k-dot fixed LCD and, crucially, a 1166-dot electronic viewfinder - an invaluable feature in bright outdoor shooting where glare can obscure the rear screen. The ZS100 also benefits from touchscreen controls, making menu navigation and focus point selection far quicker and more intuitive.
7. Durability and Environmental Sealing: Built For Different Lives
If I had a nickel for every time a photographer lost a camera to a little rain or an unexpected tumble, I’d be on a beach somewhere sipping something overpriced. The difference in durability here is stark:
-
Olympus TG-810: Waterproof to 10m (33ft), shockproof to 2.1m, freezeproof to -10°C, dustproof, and crushproof (though not rated here). This camera was purpose-built for outdoors, beach trips, mountain hikes, even pool parties.
-
Panasonic ZS100: No environmental sealing - more delicate and needs careful handling in adverse weather.
For underwater or extreme adventure photographers, the Olympus comes out miles ahead, no contest.
8. Battery Life and Storage: Staying Power and Memory
No one wants a camera that dies mid-adventure or locks you to one card slot:
-
TG-810: Rated for approximately 220 shots per charge using the LI-50B battery. Storage via a single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot. Modest, but typical for its size and age.
-
ZS100: Rated at 300 shots per charge. Also uses one SD card slot but benefits from Panasonic’s energy-efficient design and more modern battery tech.
For all-day travel photography, the ZS100’s longer battery life is a welcome convenience.
9. Connectivity and Extra Features: Keeping Up With the Times
Connectivity is often overlooked but hugely impactful for workflows, especially if you like quickly sharing photos or GPS tagging your locations:
-
Olympus TG-810: Includes built-in GPS and Eye-Fi WiFi connectivity - Eye-Fi cards are a bit archaic now, but the GPS logging is handy for adventure geotagging.
-
Panasonic ZS100: Has built-in WiFi for remote control and image transfer but lacks GPS.
Here, it’s a mixed bag: Olympus has better geotagging; Panasonic offers modern wireless sharing.
10. Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s kick it up a notch and see how these cameras fare in various photographic arenas. Reference this performance chart:
-
Portraits: Panasonic ZS100’s 1-inch sensor and aperture control produce more pleasing background blur and natural skin tones. The Olympus TG-810 struggles due to smaller sensor and limited aperture choices.
-
Landscape: ZS100’s superior dynamic range and resolution make it a winner in detailed landscape shots. Olympus’s toughness helps in harsh environments, but image files lack depth.
-
Wildlife: ZS100’s longer 250mm zoom and faster AF make it far better for wildlife - TG-810’s 140mm max focal length and slower AF limit reach and capture quality.
-
Sports: ZS100 has a continuous shooting rate near 10 fps and tracking AF; Olympus shoots just 1 fps with slow AF - no competition here.
-
Street: Olympus’s small size and ruggedness mean you can shoot anywhere worry-free; ZS100’s EVF and better image quality offer superior frames but is bigger/less discrete.
-
Macro: Olympus close-focus (3cm) plus ruggedness lets you explore close-up shoots anywhere; ZS100 slightly less close but better image quality.
-
Night/Astro: ZS100 with higher max ISO and RAW shooting is vastly better for low-light genres. TG-810 noisy and limited ISO cap.
-
Video: ZS100 shines with 4K and better stabilization; Olympus only basic HD.
-
Travel: ZS100’s zoom versatility, image quality, and battery life generally outperform; Olympus’s waterproof ruggedness useful in wet, rough travel.
-
Professional Use: ZS100’s RAW files, precise manual controls, and robust image quality serve semi-pro workflows better.
11. Image Gallery: Seeing the Difference
Don’t just take my word for it - here’s a curated gallery showing side-by-side samples from both cameras under various lighting and subject conditions:
Notice the Panasonic ZS100’s finer details, richer tones, and lower noise in shadow areas. The Olympus TG-810 files look noisier and less detailed but hold up well in brightly lit, challenging outdoor environments.
12. Summing Up their Strengths: Who Should Pick What?
If I had to distill this expansive comparison down to actionable recommendations, here’s how I’d advise different users:
-
Pick the Olympus TG-810 if you:
- Prioritize absolute ruggedness and waterproofing without extra cases.
- Are an outdoor enthusiast or extreme sports hobbyist.
- Need a simple point-and-shoot, no manual fiddling.
- Shoot mostly in daylight and don’t mind limited image quality.
- Want GPS logging for your adventures.
-
Pick the Panasonic ZS100 if you:
- Desire excellent image quality in a compact package.
- Want extensive manual control including exposure modes and RAW.
- Need long zoom reach with faster, more accurate AF.
- Are keen on 4K video and 4K Photo capabilities.
- Will be shooting diverse subjects from landscapes to portraits.
- Value an EVF and touchscreen interface.
13. Final Grades: Delivering a Verdict Based on Experience
Here’s a visual overview scoring their overall performance across core attributes:
The Panasonic ZS100 outclasses the TG-810 in imaging, handling, and features, naturally reflecting it’s a more modern and enthusiast-targeted camera. Olympus gains points for toughness and reliable simplicity.
Closing Thoughts: What I Learned Shooting these Two Cameras Back to Back
Testing the Olympus TG-810 and Panasonic ZS100 gave me a great reminder: it's not about which camera is 'better' in a vacuum, but which camera fits your shooting style, environment, and technical expectations.
The TG-810 is an indestructible companion that lets you document rugged memories without fear - think snapshots at the lake, hiking, or skiing. The ZS100, on the other hand, rewards those eager to wring the best image quality, zoom flexibility, and creative control from a compact body.
Between these two, your choice is a classic trade-off: durability vs. image sophistication.
If you’re on a budget and crave resilience, the TG-810 still has its appeal (and can be found used for much less than MSRP). For serious photographers who want a capable, versatile pocket powerhouse - Panasonic’s ZS100 remains competitive even years after its release.
I hope this deep dive helps you wade through the noise and find the camera that clicks with your photography passion and lifestyle. Remember, no camera is perfect, but the right one makes all the difference.
Happy shooting!
End of article
Olympus TG-810 vs Panasonic ZS100 Specifications
Olympus TG-810 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-810 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ100 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-08-16 | 2016-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 9.9 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) | 312 gr (0.69 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 559 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 300 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $428 | $700 |