Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc791/dc791c379c416f050f2a7563d8e9c10fefab17d4" alt="Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 front"
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Olympus TG-810 and Ricoh CX1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-810 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-810 was announced 2 years after the CX1 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the TG-810 grades against the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-810 and Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-810 Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Ricoh CX1
TG-810 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus TG-810
CX1 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-810 and Ricoh CX1
TG-810 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-810 provides outside measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-810 and Ricoh CX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-810 against the CX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/770fa/770faf2b531c8733b3a7fccb9adeb7c49815c694" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-810 and CX1 is 92 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/566a4/566a48740a32514ab54591282a3d510bf5e2c649" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-810 and CX1.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-810 to show more detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern TG-810 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0b8e/b0b8eba828555fe8e527890f8f35eefe39425aa6" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55e75/55e752d958aa577a9812e943218b4aa937e2b5bc" alt="Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-810 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus TG-810 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-810 | Ricoh CX1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-08-16 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 180g (0.40 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $428 | $299 |