Olympus TG-810 vs Sony QX30: An Expert Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

When choosing a compact camera, particularly in these lean digital days where smartphones tussle for supremacy, pinpointing the right model means balancing specs, handling, and intended use. Today, I’m diving into two uniquely styled cameras from Olympus and Sony - the rugged Olympus TG-810 and the lens-style Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 - to shed light on what each excels at, where compromises kick in, and who truly benefits from them.

Both cameras inhabit fairly niche zones with overlapping 5.8x sensor crop but diverging philosophies. The TG-810 is a weatherproof, compact all-rounder equipped for adventure, while the QX30 acts as a lens-shaped camera you tether to your smartphone - an intriguing smartphone photography extender. I’ve tested both extensively, covering all major photography styles and technical angles. Let’s unpack the details.

First Impressions & Ergonomics: Olympus’s Bulk vs Sony’s Lens Concept

Starting with physical size and build, the Olympus TG-810 feels robust in hand, weighing 215 grams with dimensions roughly 100x65x26 mm. Its compact-but-bulky form emphasizes durability - waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and even freezeproof. These credentials make it ideal for hiking, beach days, and rough-and-tumble fieldwork without fearing the elements.

In contrast, the Sony QX30 is a 193-gram lens-style camera that looks more like an external zoom lens than a standalone camera (68x65x58 mm). It lacks a traditional body with controls and screen. Instead, it requires pairing with a smartphone for control and image preview, essentially acting as an optical zoom module with its own sensor. This design makes it incredibly portable but demands reliance on your phone’s interface.

Both designs have their place depending on workflow preferences:

• TG-810 suits users who want a self-contained, rugged shooter with physical buttons and a fixed display.
• QX30 targets smartphone shooters craving long zoom reach and better sensor quality without switching to a bigger camera.

The top control layouts further reflect these differences.

The Olympus offers traditional mode dials and physical buttons - easy to adjust on the fly, tactile even with gloves. Sony’s QX30, lacking buttons aside from shutter release and zoom rocker, pushes users to the touchscreen smartphone app, which feels less instantaneous but offers exposure priority modes absent on Olympus.

Sensor, Image Quality & Processing: Old School CCD vs Modern BSI CMOS

At the heart of image quality, both cameras sport 1/2.3” sensors measuring 6.17x4.55 mm, but the Olympus uses a 14MP CCD sensor while Sony employs a more modern 20MP BSI CMOS sensor.

What do these technical choices mean in practice?

• Olympus TG-810’s CCD sensor leans on tried-and-true color reproduction and decent dynamic range for a compact camera of its era. However, CCDs generally consume more power and suffer in low light compared to CMOS sensors.
• Sony QX30’s BSI CMOS sensor benefits from back-illuminated architecture, boosting its low-light sensitivity and noise performance. Plus, higher resolution (20MP) allows for more cropping flexibility and detail capture at equivalent focal lengths.

The true test: shooting in varied ISO conditions. The TG-810 maxes out at ISO 1600 native and lacks RAW support, meaning limited post-processing latitude. Meanwhile, the QX30 reaches ISO 3200 and supports richer JPEG flexibility via its Bionz X processor but also lacks RAW (a bummer for pros wanting total control).

Consequently, for landscapes and detail-critical photography, the Sony's sensor provides a clearer edge in sharpness and color fidelity under most lighting. Olympus can still hold its own in daylight but loses ground at dusk or indoors.

The Viewfinder and Screen Experience: Fixed LCD vs Phone-Dependent Live View

Olympus includes a 3” fixed TFT LCD with a respectable 920K-dot resolution. The screen is bright enough for outdoor use and offers live view framing along with a simple, button-driven menu system.

Sony’s QX30 lacks any screen whatsoever, relying entirely on a smartphone or tablet’s display via WiFi connection. That brings mixed blessings:

• Immediate smartphone integration lets you use your phone’s bigger, higher-res screen.
• But WiFi lag can introduce delays (half-second or more) between camera and phone, impacting timing for fast action.

From a usability standpoint:

• I appreciated Olympus’s instant “point and shoot” readiness, especially in rough outdoor conditions where fumbling phones could be a pain.
• Sony’s touchscreen interface gives more exposure control options but demands a stable, paired device - not always convenient in field scenarios.

If you want complete creative control on a compact standalone, Olympus’s dedicated screen wins; if you’re comfortable tethered smartphone shooting, Sony’s approach offers bigger viewing but at the cost of responsiveness.

Zoom and Lens Quality: Wide to Telephoto Versus Superzoom Range

One standout spec backs Sony’s QX30 as a super-telephoto lens-style camera: a whopping 24-720 mm (30x optical zoom) with maximum apertures ranging F3.5-6.3.

Olympus offers a more modest zoom range of 28-140 mm (5x optical zoom) at F3.9-5.9, typical for rugged compacts that aim for balanced versatility over sheer reach.

What does that mean for photography styles?

• With Sony’s 720 mm equivalent reach, birders, wildlife, and sports shooters can get much closer to distant subjects without bulky telephoto lenses.
• Olympus is better suited for casual zoom use: landscapes, portraits, and macro photography where super-telephoto isn’t needed.

Both cameras include image stabilization - Olympus uses sensor-shift stabilization, and Sony relies on optical stabilization in the lens - crucial at long focal lengths to reduce blur.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Contrast Detection and Burst Rates

When assigning cameras to wildlife and sports photography, autofocus speed and continuous shooting become critical.

• Olympus TG-810 employs contrast detection autofocus with face detection but limited focus points. Its continuous shooting rate is meager - just 1 frame per second - with no continuous autofocus tracking.
• Sony QX30 also uses contrast detection autofocus with face detection but ups the burst shooting to a significant 10 fps, although autofocus remains single-shot without continuous tracking.

Sample Gallery and Image Quality in Real World Use

If you’re picturing image quality comparisons in your mind’s eye, let me anchor perceptions using actual samples.

Olympus TG 810 front Olympus TG 810 screen back Sony QX30 front Sony QX30 screen back

Olympus images display punchy colors with pleasing skin tones for portraits. Bokeh - the quality of background blur - is smooth but not particularly creamy given moderate aperture and short zoom range. Landscapes render well with reasonable dynamic range.

Sony’s shots show sharper detail on telephoto subjects but can sometimes feel over-sharpened or cooler in white balance out of the box. Low-light samples reflect its better sensor design but with more noise creeping in beyond ISO 800.

Build Quality and Durability: Adventure Ready vs Delicate Device

If your photography style includes hiking, snorkeling, or rough terrain, Olympus’s waterproof (up to 10m), dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof design leans heavily in your favor. The TG-810 feels like a tank you can toss into adverse conditions - an important consideration for those traveling far from civilization.

Sony’s QX30 lacks any weather sealing and needs careful handling. Its lens-style form makes it more vulnerable to knocks and moisture. This model isn’t primed for adventure but more for casual everyday or controlled conditions.

Battery Life and Storage: Modest Power, Multiple Media

Olympus’s LI-50B battery offers around 220 shots per charge, respectable for a compact but falls short for extensive fieldwork - spare batteries are advisable. It uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards and sports a USB 2.0 port and HDMI output for easy file transfer and external display.

Sony’s smaller NP-BN battery clocks in at roughly 200 shots per charge, similar but slightly less enduring. Storage is more diverse: microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, and Sony’s proprietary Memory Stick Micro, allowing flexibility but potentially needing more adapter swaps.

Wireless connectivity differs dramatically:

• Olympus supports Eye-Fi card integration for WiFi transfer but lacks Bluetooth or NFC.
• Sony includes built-in WiFi with NFC for easier smartphone pairing - a big plus for instant sharing, though connectivity can be temperamental.

Video Capabilities: Basic HD vs Full HD Recording

Video specs further highlight their generational divide.

• Olympus records at 1280x720 (HD) at 30fps with no external mic input and basic H.264 encoding.
• Sony shoots full 1080p HD video at 60p or 30p frame rates, also in MPEG-4, but similarly lacks mic or headphone ports.

Neither camera is a video powerhouse, but Sony’s smoother frame rates and higher resolution give it an edge for casual videographers on the move.

Photography Discipline Performance: Who’s Best For What?

Here’s a quick rundown cross-referenced with my real-world testing and technical appraisals:

Portrait Photography

• Olympus TG-810 produces pleasant skin tones and decent bokeh with 5x zoom at F3.9-5.9 apertures. Face detection autofocus helps nail expressive shots.
• Sony QX30 offers higher resolution, but bokeh control is less noticeable due to small maximum apertures and dependence on phone interface.

Winner: Olympus, for instant framing and color warmth.

Landscape Photography

• Sony's higher resolution and better dynamic range help capture detailed landscapes.
• Olympus’s rugged build favors shooting in harsh environments.

Winner: Sony for image quality; Olympus for durability.

Wildlife & Sports Photography

• Sony’s 720 mm zoom and 10 fps burst enable distant, fast-action capture.
• Olympus’s limited zoom and burst rate make it less ideal here.

Winner: Sony hands down.

Street Photography

• Olympus offers quick on-body controls and weatherproofing, great for unpredictable urban environments.
• Sony’s tethered setup less discreet, plus WiFi lag can miss candid moments.

Winner: Olympus for street shooters.

Macro Photography

• Olympus supports macro focusing from 3cm with sensor-shift stabilization; good for flora and small subjects.
• Sony doesn’t specify macro range; close focusing likely more limited.

Winner: Olympus.

Night / Astro Photography

• Sony’s back-illuminated CMOS gives better low-light performance, but both models lack long exposure modes or advanced noise reduction.
• Olympus’s ISO capped and older sensor limits night image quality.

Winner: Sony.

Video

• Sony's 1080p60 HD beats Olympus’s 720p30.
• Both lack professional audio input.

Winner: Sony.

Travel Photography

• Olympus weighs a bit more but is rugged, waterproof, and doesn’t rely on another device.
• Sony is compact but depends on a smartphone; battery life slightly shorter.

Winner: Depends - rugged adventurers lean Olympus; casual tele-zoom lovers lean Sony.

Professional Work

• Neither supports RAW or professional workflows.
• Connectivity options limited.
• Olympus’s standalone usability vs Sony’s required smartphone tether limits pro reliability.

Winner: Neither ideal for pro; Olympus slightly more dependable standalone.

Pros and Cons Summed Up

Personal Verdict for Different Users and Budgets

After hands-on use, I have clear favorites depending on your needs:

• For Adventure and Rugged Outdoor Photography: The Olympus TG-810 is your best bet if you need splashproof, drop-resistant gear that won’t quit in harsh environments. It’s a cheapskate-friendly alpine buddy ready for mud and waves, with solid all-round capabilities and physical controls you can operate even wearing gloves.

• For Enthusiast Zoom and Telephoto shooters using Smartphones: Sony QX30 offers an unmatched zoom range with respectable image quality, ideal if you want to boost your phone’s photographic reach and get creative with zoom-filled wildlife or travel shots. Just accept the compromises of slow WiFi tethering and delicate handling.

• For Casual Vacation and Travel Shooters: Olympus’s simpler workflow and durability are easier to rely on on the fly, despite limited zoom. The QX30 is a wild card that requires planning and good smartphone integration.

• For Video-centric Users: Sony’s full HD 60p video wins, though neither is seriously suited for professional video work.

Given their prices (Olympus ~$427, Sony ~$348 as of writing), the TG-810 offers better value for rugged use and standalone reliability, while the QX30 targets the niche want-to-zoom-with-smartphone crowd willing to trade a traditional camera experience for ultimate portability and zoom flexibility.

Final Thoughts: Which Fits Your Photography Lifestyle?

Choosing between Olympus TG-810 and Sony QX30 boils down to priorities - rugged self-contained performance versus high-zoom smartphone synergy.

If you frequently shoot outdoors in rough terrain, splashy adventures, or need instant, accessible controls, Olympus delivers with no surprises and no phone required. But if zoom reach, higher resolution, and smartphone connectivity excite you - maybe you want to up your birding shots or travel queen your phone camera for distant landscapes - Sony shows what a lens-style camera can achieve at a well-considered price.

Happy shooting, my fellow shutterbugs! Whichever side of the coin you’re on, knowing these technical nuances and real-world tradeoffs will help you snag the camera that reliably serves your unique photographic journey.

If you want to see more detailed comparisons or hands-on workflow tips with these cameras or others in this compact rugged and lens-style niche, just drop a line. I’m always keen to share what years of testing have hammered home for practical, value-packed photography advice.

Cheers!

-- End of article --