Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/408a9/408a9d2866582d16da93a6b808591f0e980025dc" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front"
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZS200, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was brought out 7 years earlier than the ZS200 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-820 iHS scores versus the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic ZS200
TG-820 iHS | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
ZS200 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | February 2012 | Newer by 73 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1030k | Sharper display (+210k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZS200
TG-820 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS offers outer dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZS200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the ZS200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8b98/a8b982d17e84a1b28315f9b370bf6d91f1c16dad" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and ZS200 is 92 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cd2/98cd299e0d0d870002982d046620888af748cab9" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and ZS200.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75a18/75a18d9ab5a08491403a47d2b92eb8d1f727309b" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fd57/1fd57b1492d3b9e1cbce5e686c45b06cdf4b439b" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-02-08 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 370 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $500 | $800 |