Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZR1, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the ZR1 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 2 years after the ZR1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the ZR1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Panasonic ZR1
TG-820 iHS | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 31 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 230k | Crisper display (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
ZR1 | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZR1
TG-820 iHS | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with physical measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Panasonic ZR1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the ZR1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and ZR1 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and ZR1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you really should take the release date of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-820 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 5.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $280 |