Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony S950
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Launched February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony S950 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony S950, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the S950 (10MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 3 years after the S950 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the S950 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony S950 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony S950
| TG-820 iHS | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| S950 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony S950
| TG-820 iHS | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony S950 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony S950 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the S950.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and S950 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and S950.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-820 iHS to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent TG-820 iHS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony S950 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $130 |
