Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VH-515
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Olympus VH-515
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VH-515, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-1 iHS was unveiled 3 months prior to the VH-515 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-1 iHS matches up versus the VH-515 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Olympus VH-515. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus VH-515
| TG-1 iHS | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| VH-515 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VH-515
| TG-1 iHS | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 |  | August 2012 | Similar generation |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus VH-515 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-1 iHS versus the VH-515.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and VH-515 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and VH-515.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photos although you should really take the release date of the products into consideration.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS Portrait photography factors
Olympus VH-515 Portrait photography factors
has face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-1 iHS
Street photography with Olympus VH-515
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers focus via touch
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS Sports photography factors
Olympus VH-515 Sports photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery power (350 shots)
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
low frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography features
Olympus VH-515 Travel photography features
better than average battery power (350 CIPA)
environment proof
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
offers focus via touch
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS Landscape photography details
Olympus VH-515 Landscape photography details
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
better than average battery power (350 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse mode
really wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging details
Olympus VH-515 Vlogging details
relatively wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no external microphone jack
really wide (26mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus VH-515 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-05-08 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI90B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $399 | $648 |