Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was released 21 months prior to the WG-4 GPS making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-1 iHS scores versus the WG-4 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TG-1 iHS | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
WG-4 GPS | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2012 | Newer by 21 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TG-1 iHS | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS offers exterior dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the WG-4 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce835/ce835e9650743a050f6b68011fabf4b4588be66a" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and WG-4 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0c23/b0c235159833475dcb0b41fd6967af2a162b7629" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3581/a3581d0a0ac4a69809fcd9054e828bce450362bd" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d02ca/d02cae40ce4ade27dc9683cad4d79f23b72c8e46" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 610k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 240 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $399 | $210 |