Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus XZ-1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very well matched but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-2 iHS was released 2 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the TG-2 iHS grades against the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Olympus XZ-1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus XZ-1
| TG-2 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| XZ-1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 610k | Sharper display (+4k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus XZ-1
| TG-2 iHS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got external measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the XZ-1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and XZ-1 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The image here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and XZ-1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-2 iHS featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-2 iHS will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 610k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | OLED | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 320 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $380 | $567 |