Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Launched July 2014
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and XG-1 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-2 iHS was introduced 12 months prior to the XG-1 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the XG-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Pentax XG-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Pentax XG-1
TG-2 iHS | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 610k | 460k | Crisper display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
XG-1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2014 | June 2013 | Newer by 12 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Pentax XG-1
TG-2 iHS | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides exterior dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Pentax XG-1 has measurements of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the XG-1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and XG-1 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and XG-1.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax XG-1 to result in more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax XG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Pentax XG-1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2014-07-15 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 610k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 567 grams (1.25 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 240 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | LB-060 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $380 | $599 |