Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/083e2/083e2627ee16c701325d05e6125ad917fcb73074" alt="Samsung NX11 front Samsung NX11 front"
80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Revealed December 2010
- Succeeded the Samsung NX10
- Replacement is Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung NX11, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and NX11 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-2 iHS was revealed 2 years later than the NX11 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-2 iHS scores vs the NX11 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Samsung NX11. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung NX11
TG-2 iHS | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | ![]() | December 2010 | Fresher by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
NX11 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 610k | Clearer screen (+4k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung NX11
TG-2 iHS | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung NX11 has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") along with a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung NX11 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the NX11.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aa51/5aa518bb150da4490c75232b90f8c05048afd49a" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and NX11 is 91 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9987/e99871f0e6b6dcb70021f63de27befa27f0dba5b" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and NX11.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-2 iHS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX11 will provide more detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher TG-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeed0/eeed0e1ed27868821a975147d2bf9d0d96bf3ad9" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a493/5a4937b86c8d13e4eda9c19848f23e17db0b894d" alt="Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung NX11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung NX11 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | OLED | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 11.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 499 gr (1.10 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $380 | $626 |