Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic G1
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
82 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic G1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 360g - 124 x 84 x 45mm
- Announced January 2009
- Renewed by Panasonic G2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic G1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-3 versus Panasonic G1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and G1 (12MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and G1 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-3 was released 5 years after the G1 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-3 scores vs the G1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic G1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Panasonic G1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic G1
| TG-3 | G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 64 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G1 over the Olympus TG-3
| G1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic G1
| TG-3 | G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic G1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 provides exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G1 has specifications of 124mm x 84mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 360 grams (0.79 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-3 versus Panasonic G1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-3 and the G1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and G1 is 90 and 82 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic G1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The picture below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and G1.
Plainly, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus TG-3 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher TG-3 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic G1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic G1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2009-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 360g (0.79 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 124 x 84 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 53 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 463 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $350 | $0 |