Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax MX-1
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax MX-1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and MX-1 (12MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") possess different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-3 was announced 10 months later than the MX-1 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-3 grades vs the MX-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Pentax MX-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Pentax MX-1
| TG-3 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | July 2013 | More recent by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus TG-3
| MX-1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax MX-1
| TG-3 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 comes with physical dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax MX-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-3 against the MX-1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and MX-1 is 90 and 84 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and MX-1.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-3 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Olympus TG-3 will provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer TG-3 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2013-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 391 gr (0.86 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 290 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $400 |