Olympus TG-3 vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony T900, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-3 was launched 5 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-3 matches up versus the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony T900
TG-3 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | February 2009 | Fresher by 63 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus TG-3
T900 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony T900
TG-3 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 has outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony T900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-3 against the T900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-3 and T900.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-3 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger TG-3 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 143 grams (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $350 | $300 |