Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A58
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
68 Imaging
63 Features
72 Overall
66
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A58 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 16000 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 492g - 129 x 95 x 78mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Old Model is Sony A57
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A58 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony A58, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the A58 (20MP) is very well matched but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and A58 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-3 was unveiled 5 months after the A58 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A58 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TG-3 matches up versus the A58 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A58 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony SLT-A58. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony A58 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony A58
| TG-3 | A58 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A58 over the Olympus TG-3
| A58 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony A58
| TG-3 | A58 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | November 2013 | Similar age |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A58 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 has got outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony A58 has dimensions of 129mm x 95mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 492 grams (1.08 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 versus Sony A58 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the TG-3 vs the A58.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and A58 is 90 and 68 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A58 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The pic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and A58.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-3 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony A58 will give more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A58 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony A58 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony SLT-A58 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony SLT-A58 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2013-11-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.65x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 492g (1.08 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 129 x 95 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 753 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | 690 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $645 |
