Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Revealed February 2019
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is relatively well matched but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 II (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-4 was brought out 4 years before the FZ1000 II which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-4 scores versus the FZ1000 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
TG-4 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus TG-4
FZ1000 II | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2019 | April 2015 | Newer by 46 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 460k | Clearer screen (+780k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
TG-4 | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 provides physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 II has proportions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic FZ1000 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-4 vs the FZ1000 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and FZ1000 II is 90 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and FZ1000 II.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will give extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-4 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-04-13 | 2019-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 808g (1.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 350 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $379 | $898 |