Clicky

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Announced April 2015
  • Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
  • Updated by Olympus TG-5
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-4 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The TG-4 was revealed 5 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the TG-4 matches up vs the GR Digital III for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 TG-4 GR Digital III 
ReleasedApril 2015July 2009Fresher by 70 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-4

 GR Digital III TG-4 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 TG-4 GR Digital III 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 provides exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Check the Olympus TG-4 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-4 vs the GR Digital III.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and GR Digital III is 90 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and GR Digital III.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-4 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography info
47
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
40
manual focus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus TG-4
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
55
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography details
48
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
good battery pack (380 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-4 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography factors
74
good battery pack (380 per charge)
weather sealing
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (247g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
63
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus TG-4
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
62
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
good battery pack (380 CIPA)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
45
manual focus
very good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3")
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-4
Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital III
34
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
25
very good max aperture (f1.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus Tough TG-4Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Tough TG-4 Ricoh GR Digital III
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2015-04-13 2009-07-27
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII GR engine III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/1.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247g (0.54 lb) 208g (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-92B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $379 $399