Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-4 versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-4 was unveiled 2 years later than the EX2F and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-4 scores versus the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Samsung EX2F
TG-4 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | ![]() | December 2012 | Fresher by 29 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus TG-4
EX2F | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung EX2F
TG-4 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 offers physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-4 versus Samsung EX2F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-4 and the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd6da/cd6da08fd9838a8ecb40cf77f6a75baf74c4c45f" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and EX2F is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a293/6a293ee2fa96ec592d83cbd42d34d7f765d4c2a0" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and EX2F.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Olympus TG-4 will resolve greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3801a/3801aaa0d4e1467bd42572e5dcc7d74880d874fe" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3d69/d3d69181b6fdd077a123e2b1aaecbdace6e6f203" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 294 grams (0.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $379 | $478 |