Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung GX-1S
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced January 2006
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung GX-1S, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-4 was brought out 9 years later than the GX-1S and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TG-4 scores against the GX-1S in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Samsung GX-1S
| TG-4 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | January 2006 | More recent by 113 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 210k | Sharper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus TG-4
| GX-1S | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung GX-1S
| TG-4 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 enjoys external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung GX-1S in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-4 versus the GX-1S.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and GX-1S is 90 and 68 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The visual below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and GX-1S.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-4 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus TG-4 will produce extra detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The newer TG-4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2006-01-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 605 gr (1.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $379 | $850 |