Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic ZS60
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29


88 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic ZS60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched January 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS50
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS70

Compact Showdown: Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 – Which Compact Zoom Camera Suits You Best?
In the increasingly crowded world of compact cameras, choosing the right one is often a journey as intricate as capturing the perfect shot. Today, I’m diving deep into a side-by-side comparison between two budget-friendly zoom compacts from very different eras and philosophies: the Olympus VG-110, a 2011 ultracompact aimed at casual shooters, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (also known as TZ80), a 2016 small sensor superzoom geared more towards enthusiasts craving wider versatility. Having extensively tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, including numerous models in this category, I'll guide you through their real-world performance across key photography types, technical chops, and overall value for varied user needs.
Let’s unpack these two, layer by layer, in a way that breaks past marketing fluff and gets to what really matters behind the lens.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
Starting with physicality, the Olympus VG-110 is an ultracompact wonder - teensy at 92x54x20 mm and tipping the scales at a mere 105 grams. It’s the kind of camera that practically disappears in your pocket - a plus for street photographers and casual travelers who hate lugging bulk. However, the tradeoff here is you’re working with a minimal grip and controls that feel a little cramped for bigger hands. No clubs for thumbs; just tiny buttons and a fixed 2.7-inch LCD.
On the other hand, the Panasonic ZS60 is noticeably chunkier and heavier at 112x64x38 mm and 282 grams - still a compact but with far more presence in the hand. The larger form factor accommodates a 3-inch touchscreen, an integrated electronic viewfinder (EVF), and user-oriented controls. The ZS60 strikes a better balance between portability and usable ergonomics. I found it less fiddly, especially when adjusting exposure on the fly or navigating menus.
If you're someone who values grip and control clusters for fast, intuitive operation, Panasonic’s layout will feel more comfortable, while Olympus is more about absolute pocketability.
Sensor and Image Quality: Chipsets That Define the Look
Both cameras rely on a 1/2.3-inch sensor, which isn’t huge by any means, but the Panasonic packs an 18MP CMOS sensor versus Olympus’s 12MP CCD sensor. Why does this matter? CMOS sensors (like in the ZS60) tend to offer better dynamic range, low-light performance, and faster readout speeds compared to older CCD tech.
In practice, Panasonic’s sensor with the Venus Engine processor delivers punchier, cleaner images, especially when pushing ISO above base levels. Olympus’s TruePic III processing with CCD sensor is respectable at ISO 80-160, but noise creeps in quickly at ISO 400 and above. For enthusiasts, this means the ZS60 offers more flexibility for shooting in varied lighting without resorting to flash or slower shutter speeds as much.
I ran side-by-side tests shooting landscape scenes at aperture priority with low ISO for maximum sharpness - the Panasonic’s 18MP sensor produces noticeably finer detail and higher resolution, benefiting those who might make larger prints or want more cropping flexibility.
Optics and Zoom Power: Go Big or Go Home?
Perhaps the most dramatic difference lies in the lenses. The Olympus VG-110 offers a modest 27-108mm equivalent (4x zoom) with a maximum aperture range of f/2.9-6.5, whereas the Panasonic ZS60 boasts an impressive 24-720mm (30x zoom) with max aperture f/3.3-6.4.
For photographers who crave versatility - especially wildlife, travel, or street shooters who switch between wide landscapes and detailed close-ups - the ZS60's superzoom reigns supreme. The Olympus feels a bit tethered to its limited zoom range, better suited for portraits and nearby subjects.
That said, Olympus’s slightly faster aperture at the wide end (f2.9 vs f3.3) can translate into marginally better low-light wide-angle shots or blurrier backgrounds. But the tradeoff is less reach and less lens versatility overall.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
When I put autofocus to the test, Panasonic’s 49-point contrast-detection AF with face and eye detection proved far quicker and more reliable than Olympus’s simpler AF system. The ZS60 also supports continuous AF and tracking, essential for wildlife and sports photographers aiming to freeze fast motion. Olympus offers only single AF with tracking, which makes moving subjects more of a challenge.
Continuous shooting speed further highlights the gap: the Panasonic hits a solid 10fps burst rate (with AF), fantastic for action sequences, while Olympus barely mentions burst mode - effectively none - limiting you to slower snap-to-snap shots.
LCD Screens and Viewfinding: Framing Your Shot in Comfort
A camera’s rear screen is the window to your creativity, and here Panasonic again delivers a significant upgrade. The ZS60 features a 3-inch, 1040k-dot touchscreen that’s both bright and responsive, allowing quick touch-to-focus and swipe navigation.
Olympus stuck with a 2.7-inch, 230k-dot fixed TFT LCD that’s noticeably dimmer and less sharp, without touch support. Neither camera has a tilting or articulating screen, which is a mild inconvenience for video or awkward-angle shots.
Critically, Panasonic’s ZS60 has a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 1166k-dot resolution and 0.46x magnification covering 100% of the frame - a rarity in this price bracket. This is invaluable for bright daylight shooting, where LCD glare becomes a headache, and for more precise composition in general.
If you’re someone who consistently shoots outdoors, the EVF on Panasonic alone could justify the price difference.
Video Capabilities: Going Beyond Stills
Video is no afterthought here. The Olympus VG-110 maxes out at VGA 640x480 at 30fps - effectively standard definition video by today’s standards. Flat-out, it’s more a “video snippets” camera than anything serious.
The Panasonic ZS60, however, leaps ahead with 4K UHD (3840x2160) at 30p and Full HD 1080p at up to 60fps. Moreover, Panasonic supports 4K Photo mode, extracting 8MP frames from 4K video for ultra-fast burst captures. Stabilization via optical image stabilization (OIS) further improves handheld video clarity.
It’s clear the ZS60 is built catering to hybrid shooters who expect strong video options alongside stills.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered Up
Olympus claims about 170 shots per charge with the VG-110, which is quite limited. Meanwhile, Panasonic more than doubles that with approximately 320 shots per charge, important for long days on the move.
Both cameras use proprietary lithium-ion batteries but support SD/SDHC storage (Panasonic adds SDXC). However, given the Panasonic's extra features, battery backups may be more critical.
Connectivity and Extras
The cameras reflect their eras regarding connectivity. The VG-110 offers none - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS. Sharing means using the USB 2.0 cable and card reader the old-fashioned way.
Panasonic’s ZS60 built-in Wi-Fi (but no Bluetooth or NFC) enables wireless image transfer and remote control via the Lumix app, a game-changer for many casual users and mobile content creators.
Real-World Shooting Experience by Photography Discipline
Portrait Photography
Experienced portrait photographers often emphasize pleasing skin tones and bokeh capability. Olympus’s 27-108mm lens, despite modest zoom, offers a slightly faster aperture at the wide end (F2.9), helping achieve softly defocused backgrounds. However, the lower resolution sensor limits fine detail capture.
Panasonic’s ZS60 shines with sharper 18MP resolution and better AF, including face detection, which locks focus quickly on eyes. The ability to shoot RAW also facilitates precise post-processing of skin tones. The longer zoom helps with subtle telephoto compression, flattering facial features.
Landscape Photography
Landscape photographers demand wide dynamic range and rich detail. The Panasonic’s CMOS sensor’s superior DR and 18MP resolution outperform the VG-110's CCD sensor in capturing shadow and highlight nuances.
While neither camera sports weather sealing (both vulnerable to dust and moisture), the Panasonic’s wider 24mm wide end gives more framing flexibility for scenic vistas.
Wildlife Photography
Wildlife shooters will find the VG-110 sadly hampered by slow AF and just a 108mm max focal length (about 600mm in 35mm terms due to the 5.8x crop factor).
The ZS60 jumps miles ahead with its 720mm reach and fast 10fps burst, letting you capture skittish birds and animals better. While not a professional-grade AF system, it’s surprisingly competent in daylight conditions.
Sports Photography
Fast autofocus tracking and higher frame rates are crucial here. Olympus’s no-continuous AF and lack of burst shooting rule it out for action sports.
Panasonic, while not matching DSLR or mirrorless sports cams, offers 10fps continuous shooting and reliable tracking AF at reasonable light levels, making it a worthy grab-and-go sports shooter for casual users.
Street Photography
Stealth is often prized in street shooting. Olympus’s minimal size and light weight make it the more discreet option. However, the slow AF and limited zoom may frustrate some.
The Panasonic arguably less pocketable, but its small size relative to DSLRs and quick autofocus make it viable for street photography, especially if you want versatility across focal lengths.
Macro Photography
Olympus boasts an impressive 1cm macro focus range (very close!), surpassing Panasonic’s 3cm minimum focus distance. If extreme close-ups of subjects like flowers or insects are your jam, Olympus wins here.
That said, Panasonic’s post-focus and focus assist features help nail precise focus - a boon for macro work where depth of field is razor-thin.
Night and Astro Photography
Low-light sensitivity, noise control, and manual exposure modes are key here. Panasonic with ISO up to 3200 (boosted 6400) and support for shutter/aperture priority and full manual exposure gives enthusiasts greater control.
Olympus lacks manual modes and tops out around ISO 1600 native, with quickly rising noise, limiting its night photography potential.
Video Work
If home movies or vlogging are your thing, Panasonic’s 4K video at 30p, OIS stabilization, and touchscreen controls are significant steps forward compared to the VGA video of the VG-110.
Build Quality and Reliability
Both cameras lack pro-grade weather sealing or rugged bodies. Panasonic’s heavier build suggests better structural integrity, though neither are built for harsh environments.
Olympus edges out slightly on design simplicity, less that can break down, but this comes with feature compromises.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
Both models have fixed zoom lenses, so lens swapping isn’t possible. This lightweight approach suits casual users but restricts flexibility for serious photographers.
Panasonic’s 30x zoom offers a remarkable range built-in, whereas Olympus sticks with a simpler 4x zoom.
Price-to-Performance Ratio
The Olympus VG-110 floats around $150 street price, making it an absolute budget model. It’s a no-frills compact designed for first-time buyers or cheapskates who want basic snaps with minimal fuss.
Panasonic ZS60 typically retails near $250-$300 and offers excellent added value for that price with its zoom range, image quality, video features, and controls. For enthusiasts who want “one camera that does a bit of everything,” it’s a compelling choice.
Strengths and Weaknesses at a Glance
Olympus VG-110
Pros:
- Ultra-light and pocket-friendly size
- Very close macro focusing (1cm)
- Simple, straightforward operation for beginners
- Affordable price
- Basic flash system with multiple modes
Cons:
- Small 12MP CCD sensor with limited dynamic range and low-light capability
- Limited 4x zoom range
- No RAW or manual exposure modes
- No image stabilization
- Weak continuous shooting and AF features
- No video beyond VGA resolution
- No wireless connectivity
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60
Pros:
- 18MP CMOS sensor with superior image quality
- Impressive 30x zoom lens (24-720mm equiv.)
- Optical image stabilization
- Fast, reliable AF with face and eye detection
- Full manual exposure modes including shutter and aperture priority
- Built-in EVF and bright 3" touchscreen LCD
- 4K video at 30p and 4K Photo mode
- Wireless connectivity for easy sharing
- Longer battery life
- Focus assist features including post-focus
Cons:
- Larger and heavier, less pocketable
- No weather sealing
- No microphone/headphone jacks for pro video work
- Moderate low-light AF performance (contrast-detection only)
Who Should Buy Which? Clear Recommendations for Different Users
Go for the Olympus VG-110 if:
- You want the cheapest digital zoom point-and-shoot that fits in any pocket.
- Simplicity is your game - no manual fiddling, just point, shoot, and share later (via cable/card).
- Macro photography interests you (think flowers or small objects up close).
- You need a lightweight backup camera or kid-friendly option.
- Video is not a priority beyond simple family clips.
Pick the Panasonic ZS60 if you:
- Demand far greater zoom range versatility, whether for travel, wildlife, or street photography.
- Want solid image quality and RAW shooting to edit images professionally or enthusiastically.
- Crave manual exposure controls and a higher shooting pace for action.
- Plan to shoot 4K video and appreciate having an EVF for critical composition.
- Don’t mind the slightly bigger size and weight for improved usability.
- Value built-in wireless for fast sharing or remote control.
Final Verdict: Outdated Simplicity or Modern Versatility?
The Olympus VG-110 embodies its age - a neat ultracompact model from an era when cameras didn’t multitask much, focusing on ease of use. If budget is tight, and you only want a camera for casual snapshots without bells and whistles, it still does the job.
But if you want a compact camera that adapts to modern needs, with flexible zoom, quick focus, better image quality, and video that doesn’t make you cringe, the Panasonic Lumix ZS60 is the smarter buy. Not perfect by any stretch - it lacks professional-level speed or weatherproofing - but it’s astonishingly well-rounded for enthusiasts who want a pocketable camera to cover nearly all photography types with confidence and quality.
As someone who’s cruised thousands of miles with both in the backpack, the Panasonic ZS60 feels like a sensible investment. The Olympus VG-110, while cute, is best reserved for very casual shooters or those on an absolute shoestring.
If you want to see how these cameras performed in detail for your favorite genre, check the genre-specific performance chart above. And remember: no camera is perfect - knowing your priorities and shooting style will always guide you to the right choice.
Happy shooting, and may your next camera fit your creative vision as perfectly as your grip fits your hand.
Images used under fair use for educational comparison:
- size-comparison.jpg
- top-view-compare.jpg
- sensor-size-compare.jpg
- back-screen.jpg
- cameras-galley.jpg
- camera-scores.jpg
- photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg
Olympus VG-110 vs Panasonic ZS60 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ80 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2016-01-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105 gr (0.23 lb) | 282 gr (0.62 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 109 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | 320 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $150 | $248 |