Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR II
97 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR II, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the VG-110 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-110 was revealed 5 years before the GR II and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the VG-110 grades vs the GR II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR II. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh GR II
VG-110 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus VG-110
GR II | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | February 2011 | More recent by 53 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR II
VG-110 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 enjoys physical measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GR II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-110 versus the GR II.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and GR II is 97 and 89 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and GR II.
Plainly, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VG-110 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GR II will show more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older VG-110 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh GR II |
Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105 gr (0.23 pounds) | 251 gr (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $150 | $599 |