Olympus VG-110 vs Sony S2000
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-110 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony S2000, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is very well matched and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VG-110 was introduced 14 months later than the S2000 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the VG-110 scores vs the S2000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-110 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sony S2000
| VG-110 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus VG-110
| S2000 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sony S2000
| VG-110 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-110 has got exterior dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony S2000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the VG-110 versus the S2000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and S2000 is 97 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-110 and S2000.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VG-110 to give you more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern VG-110 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus VG-110 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 105g (0.23 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $150 | $225 |