Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax MX-1
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Launched July 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus VG-160 versus Pentax MX-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is very similar but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and MX-1 (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VG-160 was released 17 months earlier than the MX-1 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the VG-160 scores against the MX-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 & Pentax MX-1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Pentax MX-1
| VG-160 | MX-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus VG-160
| MX-1 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Pentax MX-1
| VG-160 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-160 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Pentax MX-1 has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") along with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-160 versus Pentax MX-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 vs the MX-1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and MX-1 is 96 and 84 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and MX-1.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VG-160 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus VG-160 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VG-160 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Pentax MX-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2013-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 391 gr (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 208 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 images | 290 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | D-Li-106 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $90 | $400 |
