Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VG-160 was brought out 3 years prior to the WG-4 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the VG-160 matches up against the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 & Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh WG-4
| VG-160 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus VG-160
| WG-4 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-4
| VG-160 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-160 has external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the VG-160 versus the WG-4.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and WG-4.
As you can tell, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to offer you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 shots | 240 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $90 | $330 |