Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750
Portability
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VG-160 was brought out 5 months after the WB750 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the VG-160 matches up versus the WB750 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung WB750
| VG-160 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Olympus VG-160
| WB750 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung WB750
| VG-160 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | September 2011 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the VG-160 versus the WB750.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WB750 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and WB750.
As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus VG-160 to deliver more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images way more aggressively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB750 Portrait photography information
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
manual focus
megapixel count decent (13 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Olympus VG-160 Street photography information
Samsung WB750 Street photography information
lighter than competitors (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (193 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Olympus VG-160 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Sports photography camera
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (165 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (13 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography info
Samsung WB750 Travel photography info
lighter than competitors (125 grams)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (165 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lighter than competitors (193 grams)
megapixel count decent (13MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (432mm)
no Timelapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB750 Landscape photography info
really wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3")
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery pack (165 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse mode
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (13 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus VG-160
Vlogging with Samsung WB750
really wide (26mm)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (125g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic support
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (193g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $90 | $339 |
