Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus VH-410 and Sigma Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the VH-410 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The VH-410 was launched 4 years before the Quattro which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the VH-410 matches up versus the Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VH-410 and Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-410 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Sigma Quattro
VH-410 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus VH-410
Quattro | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | ![]() | August 2012 | Newer by 42 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Sigma Quattro
VH-410 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VH-410 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-410 and Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the VH-410 vs the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a3b/a3a3b6c398451b50a6ab3ef9e677c4dc02b20981" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and Quattro is 95 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1960d/1960db28aeb629fbf9046f138cd2e460388f9fa6" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the VH-410 and Quattro.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VH-410 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma Quattro will give you more detail utilizing its extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged VH-410 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f24d/9f24d765fe4a10ddeed3b9a0ff3b58bb69baecf1" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d51bf/d51bf68c965069fc864a7d0b9e736abea2a5f7e8" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus VH-410 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-50B | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $186 | $738 |