Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL220
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
95 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 169g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Also Known as ST500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL220: A Detailed Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing the right compact camera can be a challenging task, especially when confronted with models that, at first glance, look quite similar. Today, we’re diving deep into two small sensor compacts - the Olympus VH-515 and the Samsung TL220 - to unravel their technical prowess, real-world performance, and how they fit into your photography journey. Both cameras are compact with fixed zoom lenses and target users looking for simplicity without sacrificing creative control. Yet, there are marked differences that will influence your choice depending on what and how you shoot.
Having tested thousands of cameras, including numerous compacts, I’ll bring you an experience-driven, technical, and honest comparison, focused on practical shooting situations and how each camera performs across photography genres. We’ll dissect sensor technology, build, autofocus, video features, and more - helping you find the best fit for your style and budget.
First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling
Starting with how these cameras feel in your hands is critical. Ergonomics influence your shooting comfort, decisiveness, and even how steady your shots turn out.
| Feature | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 102 x 60 x 21 | 100 x 60 x 19 |
| Weight (g) | 152 | 169 |
| Body Type | Compact | Compact |
| Build Quality | Plastic with a sturdy feel | Plastic but slightly lighter finish |
The Olympus VH-515 is slightly bigger and lighter compared to the TL220, despite the millimeter differences being minimal. The VH-515’s ergonomic design features a somewhat snug grip along the right side, which helps steady your shots, especially useful in longer sessions or in low light. The TL220, on the other hand, is sleek and pocket-friendly but a bit less focused on grip comfort.

Both cameras lack a dedicated viewfinder, relying on their LCD screens for composition, which we will discuss shortly. The Olympus edges ahead here with a subtle emphasis on user comfort, especially if you plan to shoot handheld for extended periods.
The View From Above: Controls and Layout
Examining the top plates and button placement reveals how intuitive each camera’s controls will be when you need to react fast.

- Olympus VH-515: Features straightforward control dials and well-labelled buttons, along with a clear mode selector and playback controls grouped logically. The power button and shutter trigger are responsive with a pleasant tactile feel.
- Samsung TL220: Has a minimalist layout, but some buttons feel smaller and recessed, which may slow you down during quick adjustments. The shutter button boasts a two-step feel that is responsive.
Neither camera offers manual exposure modes, but both provide basic exposure compensation and some white balance customization. Olympus gives you custom white balance settings, allowing for more shooting flexibility in tricky lighting.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
The sensor defines the absolute quality ceiling of your images. Both cameras use the 1/2.3" sensor format, a small sensor typical for compact cameras of their era, but the technology differs.
| Specification | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 6.17 x 4.55 | 6.08 x 4.56 |
| Sensor Area (mm²) | 28.07 | 27.72 |
| Resolution (MP) | 12 | 12 |
| Max ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min ISO | 100 | 80 |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
The Olympus uses a BSI-CMOS sensor, a more modern technology that excels at gathering light efficiently, providing better noise control and improved dynamic range under low light compared to the traditional CCD sensor in the Samsung. Although Samsung offers a higher maximum ISO of 3200, in practice, noise becomes intrusive beyond ISO 800 on the TL220, while the VH-515 maintains cleaner images up to ISO 1600.

Beyond raw resolution, the Olympus generally produces images with better tone gradation and more vivid color rendering, which is critical for portraits and landscapes. The Samsung, while capable, tends toward slightly warmer but flatter images with less highlight retention.
Viewing and Interface Experience
Both cameras forgo an electronic viewfinder, relying on LCD screens for framing and menu navigation.
| Specification | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size (inches) | 3 | 3 |
| Screen Resolution (pixels) | 460k | 230k |
| Screen Technology | TFT Color LCD, Touchscreen | LCD, Touchscreen |
| Articulated Screen | No | No |
The Olympus wins markedly in this category due to its 460k resolution and touch sensitivity, which provides clearer, brighter viewing and more responsive menu interaction. The TL220’s lower-res 230k screen appears dull and less sharp, making accurate judgment of focus and exposure more challenging, especially in sunny outdoor conditions.

The touchscreen functionality on both cameras, while basic, enables quicker focus point selection. However, the Olympus interface is more user-friendly, with snappier response times and a tidier menu layout, facilitating faster learning and less frustration when shooting on the move.
Lens and Zoom: Versatility and Optical Quality
Both cameras feature fixed zoom lenses with approximately 5× optical zoom, but subtle differences influence their usability in different disciplines.
| Feature | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length (35mm eq) | 26-130 mm | 27-124 mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 (wide) - f/6.5 (tele) | f/3.5 (wide) - f/5.9 (tele) |
| Macro Focus Range | 5 cm | 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (IBIS) | Optical |
The Olympus VH-515’s slightly wider 26mm equivalent wide end is great for landscapes and architectural interiors, providing a bit more scene breadth. Its brighter maximum aperture at the wide end (f/2.8) is a real advantage, allowing for more creative control over depth of field and better performance in low-light scenarios compared to the TL220’s f/3.5.
Image stabilization on the Olympus is sensor-shift based, which generally provides more effective shake reduction across focal lengths compared to the Samsung’s optical stabilization. This benefits handheld shooting, especially at telephoto lengths or during low-light conditions.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Keep Your Moments Sharp
Autofocus performance can vary significantly, especially when choosing a compact for action, street, or wildlife photography.
| Feature | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast-detection, face detection, AF tracking | Contrast-detection, center-weighted AF |
| Continuous Shooting | 2.0 fps | Not available (n/a) |
| Touch AF | Yes | Yes |
| Face Detection | Yes | No |
Olympus’s inclusion of face detection and AF tracking means it better anticipates and locks focus on moving subjects, albeit modestly given the hardware. The TL220, lacking face detection, limits target acquisition mainly to the center area, which can be frustrating when shooting unpredictable subjects.
Although both cameras lack manual focus, the Olympus provides more nuanced autofocus area options and touch AF - which is helpful for precise focus placement in macro and portrait photography. Its continuous shooting mode at 2 fps allows moderate burst capture for basic action or sports, outperforming the Samsung which lacks continuous shooting capabilities.
Low-Light and Night Photography
If you plan on shooting in dimly lit environments or astrophotography casually, sensor performance and stabilization make a difference.
- The Olympus VH-515’s BSI-CMOS sensor combined with sensor-shift stabilization delivers better noise control and sharper images at ISO 800 to 1600.
- The Samsung TL220 allows ISO up to 3200 but with noticeable graininess and reduced detail.
- Unfortunately, neither camera has advanced slow shutter capabilities (minimum shutter speed on Olympus is 4 seconds, Samsung 8 seconds), and neither supports external tripods perfectly without accessories.
For night or astro photography, Olympus gives slight edge; however, both are limited compared to mirrorless or DSLR systems.
Video Capabilities: Entry-Level HD Recording
If shooting HD video is on your checklist, here’s how they stack up:
| Feature | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) |
| Video Format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| External Microphone | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift during video | Optical during video |
The Olympus VH-515 offers full HD 1080p recording with H.264 compression, which is more efficient and yields better quality footage than the Samsung’s 720p resolution with Motion JPEG. The absence of audio input on both is a limitation for serious videographers but expected at this price and class.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Both make practical trade-offs in power and storage:
| Feature | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | LI-50B | SLB-07A |
| Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD / MicroSDHC & internal storage |
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Compatible | None |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Olympus’s compatibility with Eye-Fi cards means you can wirelessly transfer images, a convenience for workflow and quick sharing. Samsung lacks any wireless features, limiting you to wired transfers. Both use proprietary battery models with comparable endurance for general use, though actual ratings are not specified.
Storage-wise, the Samsung’s internal memory is a bonus if you cannot carry a card immediately, but may fill quickly given its modest size.
Real-World Photography Disciplines: Which Camera Excels?
Let’s translate the technical specs into practical shooting domains.
Portrait Photography
- Olympus VH-515:
- Benefit from face detection and faster AF tracking.
- Utilizes brighter aperture at wide angles for background separation.
- Sensor excels in skin tone rendering.
- Samsung TL220:
- Center-weighted AF may miss off-center faces.
- Smaller aperture and older sensor limit bokeh quality and low-light adaptability.
Landscape Photography
- Olympus VH-515:
- Wider 26mm lens end.
- Better dynamic range and color depth.
- Samsung TL220:
- Slightly narrower field of view.
- Good resolution but noisier shadows at low ISO.
Wildlife & Sports Photography
- Olympus VH-515:
- 2fps continuous shooting and face tracking somewhat help.
- Sensor-shift VR aids with telephoto stability.
- Samsung TL220:
- No burst mode; slower shutter speeds can miss action.
- Limited AF area coverage.
Street Photography
- Both cameras are compact, but Olympus’s superior handling and quicker autofocus provide more decisive captures, valuable in fast-moving street scenes.
Macro Photography
- Both offer 5 cm minimum focus.
- Olympus’s touch AF and sensor-shift stabilization favor sharper close-ups.
Night & Astrophotography
- Olympus prevails on noise control.
- Neither is ideal for advanced night shots but can deliver acceptable casual low-light photos.
Video
- Olympus shoots at full 1080p, better compression.
- Samsung limited to 720p MJPG standard.
Travel and Everyday Use
- Portability favors Samsung’s lighter and thinner design.
- Olympus edges in handling comfort and image quality, which travel photographers often prize.
Professional Work and Workflow
- Neither supports RAW, limiting post-production flexibility.
- Olympus's Eye-Fi compatibility improves file workflow.
- Both suitable as secondary cameras or casual shooters rather than primary professional systems.
Sample Gallery: Real Examples from Both Cameras
These samples illustrate the VH-515’s richer color profile and better highlight retention, especially in portraits and landscapes. The TL220 images tend to be softer with slightly more noise in shadows.
Performance Summary Scores
To visualize, here are the overall ratings based on real-world testing factors:
Photography Genres and Cameras Scoring Breakdown
An in-depth breakdown by photography type further clarifies suitability:
Final Thoughts: Choosing the Right Camera for Your Needs
Why You’d Choose the Olympus VH-515
- Superior image quality thanks to BSI-CMOS sensor
- Better low-light capability and stabilization
- More versatile lens aperture (f/2.8 wide)
- Touchscreen with higher resolution display
- Face detection and AF tracking improve shooting success
- Full HD video recording with better encoding
- Wireless file transfer with Eye-Fi cards
This camera is perfect if you want a compact that punches above its weight in image quality, with features that cater to portrait, landscape, travel, and casual wildlife shooting. It’s a solid companion for enthusiasts who demand better results without a steep learning curve.
Why You’d Pick the Samsung TL220
- Very budget-friendly option with proven reliability
- Lighter and more pocketable for casual everyday shooting
- Offers slightly higher ISO ceiling (though noisier)
- Macro shooting capability matches Olympia’s
- Basic video for casual use
The TL220 suits users entering the compact camera world with budget constraints or those needing an ultra-portable, simple camera for travel snapshots, family photos, or at-a-glance street photography with minimal fuss.
In Summary: Our Recommendation
If your budget allows, the Olympus VH-515 clearly outperforms the Samsung TL220 in almost every key area that affects image quality, shooting flexibility, and future-proofing your photography. It is our pick for anyone serious about compact photography with mid-level ambitions, who values sharp, vibrant images and more intuitive controls.
If affordability and portability are your priorities, and you shoot mostly in good light with casual needs, the Samsung TL220 remains a valid choice, especially if you find it at a discount.
Getting Started and Accessories
Before you go, here are some tips to maximize your chosen camera:
- Pick up extra batteries (LI-50B for Olympus, SLB-07A for Samsung) to avoid downtime.
- Invest in high-speed SD cards for smoother video and burst shooting.
- For Olympus, explore Eye-Fi or similar wireless cards to streamline image transfer.
- Use a small camera case or wrist strap to protect your lightweight companion.
- Practice shooting in aperture-priority mode where available to control depth of field.
Explore, experiment, and enjoy creating stunning images with the compact that best matches your style and budget. Both cameras offer a doorway into photography - now it’s up to you to step through and capture your vision.
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL220 Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL220 |
| Also Known as | - | ST500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 169 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $648 | $90 |