Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FS33
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is very well matched and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was announced 19 months later than the FH22 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the VR-320 scores against the FH22 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic FH22
VR-320 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | January 2010 | Fresher by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus VR-320
FH22 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic FH22
VR-320 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 offers external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has specifications of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 against the FH22.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and FH22 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and FH22.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures but you should always factor the release date of the products into consideration. The younger VR-320 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 170g (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $179 | $200 |