Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c05f/5c05ff7b3fcd9fe9d0e7104a454032006760a3f9" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 front"
83 Imaging
51 Features
62 Overall
55
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 336g - 115 x 84 x 47mm
- Launched July 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic G2
- Renewed by Panasonic G5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic G3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the G3 (16MP) is relatively similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and G3 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The VR-320 was launched about the same time to the G3 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G3 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the VR-320 grades versus the G3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Panasonic G3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic G3
VR-320 | G3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G3 over the Olympus VR-320
G3 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic G3
VR-320 | G3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | July 2011 | Similar age |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G3 has measurements of 115mm x 84mm x 47mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 336 grams (0.74 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic G3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the VR-320 vs the G3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8f74/a8f748c362e63412b106fcf07f606c184798c494" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and G3 is 94 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7728f/7728fb22eca176d2da01886668d6809e661ab571" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The picture underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and G3.
All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Panasonic G3 will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/482e5/482e52a5f2e858fdafeef10b68a79688878d0689" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8470/c84700078e1945348d4e78622b2f6ecdea24d06e" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G3 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2011-07-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 11.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps)) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 336 gr (0.74 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 115 x 84 x 47mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 667 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $179 | $500 |