Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a056/9a0560529b2d7cdf5610656aaa640a5f52dfa356" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front"
88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic GF1
- Refreshed by Panasonic GF3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic GF2, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the GF2 (12MP) is very close but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GF2 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The VR-320 was introduced 5 months after the GF2 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the VR-320 matches up vs the GF2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic GF2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic GF2
VR-320 | GF2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Olympus VR-320
GF2 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic GF2
VR-320 | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2011 | Same generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has got exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic GF2 has sizing of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic GF2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 and the GF2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c27c8/c27c823fd7c0d0804deb7f4390a07e02f03b666d" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and GF2 is 94 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c45e/9c45e298bf4987e28a840c99d51c2955d313efaf" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The pic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and GF2.
All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9caf6/9caf6ba2bec868f0397a3d48a413c93837aa8485" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd1d8/fd1d80688027711c212f252f186e175bdb6556ba" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2011-02-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 310g (0.68 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 506 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $179 | $330 |